Compare Microsoft Teams and StarLeaf 
- Users report that Microsoft Teams excels in its Collaborative Whiteboards feature, scoring 9.2, which allows for real-time brainstorming and creativity during meetings. In contrast, StarLeaf's whiteboarding feature received a lower score of 7.9, indicating it may not be as robust for collaborative sessions.
- Reviewers mention that Microsoft Teams offers superior Screen Sharing capabilities with a score of 9.6, making it easier to share presentations and documents seamlessly. StarLeaf, however, scored 8.3 in this area, suggesting that users may experience limitations when sharing screens.
- G2 users highlight the Live Preview feature in Microsoft Teams, which scored an impressive 9.7, allowing presenters to see what they are sharing in real-time. StarLeaf does not have a comparable feature, which may hinder the presentation experience for users.
- Users on G2 report that Microsoft Teams has a more comprehensive Task Management system, scoring 8.4, which integrates well with other productivity tools. StarLeaf lacks a dedicated task management feature, which could be a drawback for teams looking for an all-in-one solution.
- Reviewers mention that Microsoft Teams provides a more effective Audio Conferencing experience, scoring 9.2, which is crucial for clear communication during meetings. StarLeaf's audio conferencing scored slightly lower at 8.9, indicating potential areas for improvement.
- Users say that Microsoft Teams has a better overall Ease of Use rating of 8.8 compared to StarLeaf's 8.2, suggesting that Teams may be more intuitive and user-friendly, which is essential for quick adoption by new users.
- Seamless integration with Exchange: Teams Essentials works with On-Premises or Hosted Exchange so that Office clients can get Teams in the cloud.
- Upgraded online meetings: Provide professional features like virtual backgrounds, screen sharing, and recording from any device for your clients.
- Fully-enabled dynamic chats: Keep conversations going internally or externally with continuous chat, searchable history, and in-app file sharing and collaboration.
- Host up to 20 participants
- Unlimited group and 1 to 1 messaging
- Unlimited 1 to 1 meetings
I like the fact that I can access the tool from everywhere - on my desktop and on my phone. It allows my to have multiple workspaces, so I can connect to my own organization as well as to the organizations of my customers. I think it is a good tool for all...
Unfortunately, a lot of the things Lync can do are obscured by the user interface. It’s attractive enough and doesn’t look cluttered at first glance, but most of my attempts to do non-basic things involve hunting through icons and menus that are...
We currently use starleaf to stay in touch with both internal and external colleagues as we are all remote working. Starleaf is simple to use and reliable we use it for informal meetings, and it is easy to invite external users. It works well on both laptop...
Starleaf is not a substitute for Skype or WebEx. Starleaf works well in conference rooms, but doesn't work well for group meetings. If too many people 25 or so join a starleaf meeting it ultimately fails for technical reasons. I believe this is called out...
I like the fact that I can access the tool from everywhere - on my desktop and on my phone. It allows my to have multiple workspaces, so I can connect to my own organization as well as to the organizations of my customers. I think it is a good tool for all...
We currently use starleaf to stay in touch with both internal and external colleagues as we are all remote working. Starleaf is simple to use and reliable we use it for informal meetings, and it is easy to invite external users. It works well on both laptop...
Unfortunately, a lot of the things Lync can do are obscured by the user interface. It’s attractive enough and doesn’t look cluttered at first glance, but most of my attempts to do non-basic things involve hunting through icons and menus that are...
Starleaf is not a substitute for Skype or WebEx. Starleaf works well in conference rooms, but doesn't work well for group meetings. If too many people 25 or so join a starleaf meeting it ultimately fails for technical reasons. I believe this is called out...
