Users report that Motion excels in multi-calendar integration with a score of 8.6, allowing seamless synchronization across various platforms, while Microsoft Scheduler, with a score of 5.6, struggles in this area, making it less effective for users managing multiple calendars.
Reviewers mention that Microsoft Scheduler shines in ease of use, scoring 9.4, which is significantly higher than Motion's score of 7.7. This makes Microsoft Scheduler a more user-friendly option for those who prioritize a straightforward interface.
G2 users highlight that Motion's appointment follow-up feature scores 6.8, indicating room for improvement, whereas Microsoft Scheduler does not provide a comparable feature, which may affect users who rely on follow-ups for their scheduling needs.
Users on G2 note that Motion's quality of support is rated at 7.6, which is lower than Microsoft Scheduler's impressive score of 9.1. This suggests that users may find more reliable assistance and resources with Microsoft Scheduler when issues arise.
Reviewers say that Motion's time zone detection feature scores 8.3, which is beneficial for users scheduling across different time zones, while Microsoft Scheduler does not have a comparable feature, potentially leading to scheduling conflicts for international users.
Users report that Motion's product direction is rated at 8.1, indicating a positive outlook for future updates, while Microsoft Scheduler boasts a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting that users can expect consistent improvements and new features in the future.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.