Compare LoopUp and Microsoft Teams 
- Users report that Microsoft Teams excels in collaboration tools, particularly with features like Screen Sharing (9.0) and Live Chat (9.2), which reviewers mention enhance real-time communication and teamwork.
- Reviewers mention that LoopUp shines in its ease of use, scoring higher in Ease of Use (9.1) compared to Microsoft Teams (8.8), making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize a straightforward interface.
- G2 users highlight that Microsoft Teams offers robust integrations (8.7) with other applications, which users say is crucial for seamless workflows, while LoopUp's integration capabilities are less emphasized.
- Users on G2 report that Microsoft Teams provides superior meeting coordination features, particularly in Scheduling (9.0) and One-Click Join (8.9), which reviewers say significantly streamline the meeting setup process.
- Reviewers mention that LoopUp's quality of support (8.1) is perceived as less favorable compared to Microsoft Teams (8.5), indicating that users may find more reliable assistance with Teams when issues arise.
- Users say that Microsoft Teams has a more positive product direction (8.5) compared to LoopUp (6.1), suggesting that Teams is viewed as a more innovative and forward-thinking solution by its user base.
- Seamless integration with Exchange: Teams Essentials works with On-Premises or Hosted Exchange so that Office clients can get Teams in the cloud.
- Upgraded online meetings: Provide professional features like virtual backgrounds, screen sharing, and recording from any device for your clients.
- Fully-enabled dynamic chats: Keep conversations going internally or externally with continuous chat, searchable history, and in-app file sharing and collaboration.
Ease of access to data on calls, e.g. who dialed in at what time from what number, how long they stayed on the call, start and end time of call, etc. Ability to control the call from the computer
People struggle to dial in from a meeting room; screenshare prevents use of video streaming platforms
I like the fact that I can access the tool from everywhere - on my desktop and on my phone. It allows my to have multiple workspaces, so I can connect to my own organization as well as to the organizations of my customers. I think it is a good tool for all...
Unfortunately, a lot of the things Lync can do are obscured by the user interface. It’s attractive enough and doesn’t look cluttered at first glance, but most of my attempts to do non-basic things involve hunting through icons and menus that are...
Ease of access to data on calls, e.g. who dialed in at what time from what number, how long they stayed on the call, start and end time of call, etc. Ability to control the call from the computer
I like the fact that I can access the tool from everywhere - on my desktop and on my phone. It allows my to have multiple workspaces, so I can connect to my own organization as well as to the organizations of my customers. I think it is a good tool for all...
People struggle to dial in from a meeting room; screenshare prevents use of video streaming platforms
Unfortunately, a lot of the things Lync can do are obscured by the user interface. It’s attractive enough and doesn’t look cluttered at first glance, but most of my attempts to do non-basic things involve hunting through icons and menus that are...
