Compare IFTTT and Make 
- Users report that IFTTT excels in its ease of use with a score of 8.9, making it a favorite for those who are new to automation, while Make, with a score of 8.6, is slightly less intuitive for beginners.
- Reviewers mention that Make shines in real-time integration, scoring 9.1, which is significantly higher than IFTTT's score of 7.9, indicating that Make is better suited for users needing immediate data synchronization.
- G2 users highlight IFTTT's extensive library of pre-built connectors, scoring 9.2, which allows for quick setup and integration with various apps, whereas Make's offerings in this area are less extensive, impacting its versatility.
- Users on G2 report that Make's Flow Designer, with a score of 9.0, provides a more robust and flexible way to create complex workflows compared to IFTTT, which lacks a similar feature, making it less suitable for advanced users.
- Reviewers mention that IFTTT has a strong community support system, reflected in its quality of support score of 8.4, while Make's score of 8.6 indicates slightly better support, but users still find IFTTT's community more engaging.
- Users say that both platforms have strong security features, but Make's higher scores in data encryption (8.4) and security standards (8.6) suggest it may offer more robust protection for sensitive data compared to IFTTT.
- No-code workflow builder
- 1000+ apps
- Custom apps
It automates many tasks when and how I need them done for me so that I do not have to. It integrates with many of the platforms I use with what is called an "applet". Having the tasks done for me is like having an assistant. I can even have it call me...
The text feature emails and texts you, so I was bombarded with communication when the rule/tasks ran. This got really annoying and was not easy to fix.
The versatility of processes that you can create without coding is a considerable upside.
Make.com was released as the flagship product too early in the development lifecycle. There are still bug fixes for features that need to be released and make workflows more difficult on the new platform than on integromat previously. I have confidence that...
It automates many tasks when and how I need them done for me so that I do not have to. It integrates with many of the platforms I use with what is called an "applet". Having the tasks done for me is like having an assistant. I can even have it call me...
The versatility of processes that you can create without coding is a considerable upside.
The text feature emails and texts you, so I was bombarded with communication when the rule/tasks ran. This got really annoying and was not easy to fix.
Make.com was released as the flagship product too early in the development lifecycle. There are still bug fixes for features that need to be released and make workflows more difficult on the new platform than on integromat previously. I have confidence that...
