Compare Ibexa DXP and WordPress.org 
- Reviewers mention that WordPress.org excels in content authoring with a score of 8.9, highlighting its user-friendly interface and rich text editor features, while Ibexa DXP, with a score of 8.2, is noted for its robust versioning capabilities but lacks the same ease of use.
- Users report that WordPress.org offers a wider breadth of pre-built templates (8.4) which simplifies the design process, whereas Ibexa DXP's templates score lower at 6.0, making it less appealing for users looking for quick design solutions.
- G2 users indicate that WordPress.org's automated publishing feature scores an impressive 8.5, allowing for seamless content scheduling, while Ibexa DXP's scheduling capabilities are rated lower at 7.4, leading to potential delays in content rollout.
- Users on G2 highlight that WordPress.org's community support (8.6) is a significant advantage, providing extensive resources and plugins, while Ibexa DXP's community engagement is rated much lower at 6.0, which may hinder user support and collaboration.
- Reviewers say that WordPress.org's SEO capabilities (8.4) are superior, making it easier for users to optimize their content for search engines, while Ibexa DXP's SEO features are rated at 7.4, indicating room for improvement in this critical area.
- Users report that while both platforms offer customization options, WordPress.org (8.5) provides a more intuitive experience compared to Ibexa DXP (8.6), which, although slightly higher, is often seen as more complex and less user-friendly.
- Advanced Content and Product Information management
There are many thing I like about eZ. First of all its open source which offers more innovation and efficiency when implementing web solutions on top of it. At the same time the end client has, optionally, enterprise level support to lower the risk....
Interface for selecting content and custom tags in content blocks, no embeddable custom form designer, coupling with YUI for new backoffice component
I can't see any reason to use another platform. Every designer, web developer, SEO hand and intern you meet will have used this platform before. You don't need to reinvent the wheel. Use the tools that your potential hires already know how to use!
The free version doesn't allow embedding Java Scripts and other applets which kinds of restricts its scalability. Lot's of spam comments are observed in wordpress blogs, though it distinguishes the spammer's but yet we need to read between each comments to...
There are many thing I like about eZ. First of all its open source which offers more innovation and efficiency when implementing web solutions on top of it. At the same time the end client has, optionally, enterprise level support to lower the risk....
I can't see any reason to use another platform. Every designer, web developer, SEO hand and intern you meet will have used this platform before. You don't need to reinvent the wheel. Use the tools that your potential hires already know how to use!
Interface for selecting content and custom tags in content blocks, no embeddable custom form designer, coupling with YUI for new backoffice component
The free version doesn't allow embedding Java Scripts and other applets which kinds of restricts its scalability. Lot's of spam comments are observed in wordpress blogs, though it distinguishes the spammer's but yet we need to read between each comments to...
