When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found GoodData easier to use, set up, and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of administration with Panorama Necto.
Reviewers felt that GoodData meets the needs of their business better than Panorama Necto.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that GoodData is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of GoodData over Panorama Necto.
I believe you can use the API to grab the emails for registered users and then pass them to an email application. Some of this will depend on how you have...Read more
Is there any way to send .csv or Excel files to people on an automated basis?
2 Comments
JK
I don’t believe this functionality exists in GoodData. You can send the PDF reports generated or you could look at sending the reports directly from your...Read more
How can I better train my team in using good data?
1 Comment
Official Response from GoodData
Hi Brittney,
To understand the full semantic data model of your data product can be sometimes overwhelming. I always suggest people start from the...Read more
Why does Necto highlight the fact that it is centralized?
1 Comment
Official Response from Panorama Necto
Federated BI, the opposite of centralized BI, is failing rapidly. Users tend to work in silos, as each modifies and saves data on their own desktop. The data...Read more
Why does Necto highlight the fact that it is centralized?
1 Comment
Official Response from Panorama Necto
Federated BI, the opposite of centralized BI, is failing rapidly. Users tend to work in silos, as each modifies and saves data on their own desktop. The data...Read more
Panorama Necto has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.