When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found FloQast easier to use. However, IRIS CARBON® is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with IRIS CARBON® overall.
Reviewers felt that IRIS CARBON® meets the needs of their business better than FloQast.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that IRIS CARBON® is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of IRIS CARBON® over FloQast.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
FloQast
No pricing available
IRIS CARBON®
No pricing available
Free Trial
FloQast
No trial information available
IRIS CARBON®
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
1,170
9.7
90
Ease of Use
9.3
1,180
9.2
91
Ease of Setup
8.9
634
9.5
32
Ease of Admin
9.1
439
9.7
12
Quality of Support
9.4
1,051
9.9
90
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
No, it won't replace them, it will link to them, and to your ERP system to bring them together in one place. That is what we really like about FloQast - we...Read more
Will FloQast be compatible with my existing ERP/ GL System?
1 Comment
RW
FloQast integrates with many systems so there would be no need to export a TB manually. If you're using NetSuite or Sage Intacct you would connect directly....Read more
What is the best way to automate trial balance uploads?
1 Comment
SS
FloQast offers a feature called FloQast Connect that will automate your trial balance uploads. This allows organizations with on-premise legacy or enterprise...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.