Compare FIS and Q2 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (70.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
FIS
Star Rating
(13)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FISQ2
Star Rating
(10)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (70.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Q2Summary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Q2 excels in ease of use with a score of 8.8, while FIS falls behind with a score of 7.9. Reviewers mention that Q2's intuitive interface makes navigation seamless, enhancing user experience.
- Reviewers say that Q2 shines in compliance features, scoring 9.0 compared to FIS's 7.8. Users highlight Q2's robust compliance tools as a significant advantage for digital banking platforms.
- Users on G2 mention that Q2 offers superior onboarding flow management, which is crucial for new users, while FIS's onboarding process is rated lower at 6.7, indicating potential challenges for new clients.
- Reviewers mention that FIS has a stronger quality of support with a score of 8.3, compared to Q2's 7.9. Users appreciate FIS's responsive customer service, which can be vital for troubleshooting issues quickly.
- G2 users report that Q2's product direction is viewed positively at 8.3, while FIS's score of 6.8 suggests some concerns about its future development. Reviewers express confidence in Q2's ongoing innovation.
- Users say that both platforms offer cloud-based solutions, but Q2's score of 8.1 in this area indicates a more robust offering compared to FIS, which also scores 8.1 but lacks some of the advanced features that Q2 provides.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Advapay
(0)
Loan Servicing
Visit Website
Sponsored
TaskSuite
(3)
Loan Servicing
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
FIS
No pricing availableQ2
No pricing availableFree Trial
FIS
No trial information availableQ2
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
11
8.8
7
Ease of Use
7.9
11
8.8
7
Ease of Setup
6.7
5
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.7
5
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.3
11
7.9
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.0
5
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
11
8.3
7
Features by Category
Operations
7.8
6
9.0
5
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Infrastructure
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
7.7
5
Platform Data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Interoperability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Additional Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Basics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Process Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity Verification
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectivity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
FIS and Q2 are categorized as Digital Banking Platforms
Unique Categories
FIS is categorized as Core Banking and Banking as a Service (BaaS)
Q2 is categorized as Digital Customer Onboarding, Financial Risk Management, Loan Origination, and Loan Servicing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
FIS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Q2
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Banking
46.2%
Market Research
15.4%
Financial Services
15.4%
Accounting
15.4%
Consulting
7.7%
Other
0.0%
Banking
40.0%
Financial Services
20.0%
Logistics and Supply Chain
10.0%
Law Practice
10.0%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Other
10.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
FIS
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Amrita G.
Verified User in Financial Services
It's ease of use and integration with other systems makes it special.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Andrew C.
Verified User in Banking
It's clunky, and doesn't always play nicely in integration.
Q2
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Jonathan T.
Verified User in Law Practice
The useful features, including the activity dashboard, import/export options, and messaging system, are really appreciated. The APIs demonstrate their versatility as tools for a variety of tasks.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Amrita G.
Verified User in Financial Services
It's ease of use and integration with other systems makes it special.
Jonathan T.
Verified User in Law Practice
The useful features, including the activity dashboard, import/export options, and messaging system, are really appreciated. The APIs demonstrate their versatility as tools for a variety of tasks.
Andrew C.
Verified User in Banking
It's clunky, and doesn't always play nicely in integration.
Alternatives
Discussions
FIS has no discussions with answers
Q2 has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
