Compare Esri ArcGIS and MapInfo Pro 
- Users report that Esri ArcGIS excels in Data Visualization with a score of 9.0, while MapInfo Pro follows closely with a score of 8.3. Reviewers mention that ArcGIS offers more advanced visualization tools, making it easier to create compelling maps and presentations.
- Reviewers mention that MapInfo Pro shines in Ease of Setup with a score of 8.8 compared to Esri ArcGIS's score of 7.3. Users say that MapInfo Pro's installation process is more straightforward, allowing for quicker onboarding.
- G2 users highlight Esri ArcGIS's superior Cartography capabilities, particularly in Map Design with a score of 9.1, while MapInfo Pro scores 8.4. Users report that ArcGIS provides more sophisticated tools for creating detailed and aesthetically pleasing maps.
- Users on G2 indicate that MapInfo Pro has a slight edge in Distance Analysis with a score of 9.2, compared to Esri ArcGIS's score of 8.8. Reviewers mention that MapInfo Pro's tools for measuring distances and analyzing spatial relationships are particularly user-friendly.
- Reviewers say that Esri ArcGIS leads in Predictive Analysis with a score of 8.4, while MapInfo Pro scores 8.0. Users report that ArcGIS offers more robust features for forecasting and modeling, which are essential for data-driven decision-making.
- Users report that both products have similar scores in Collaboration / Workflow at 8.3, but reviewers mention that Esri ArcGIS provides better integration with other platforms, enhancing team collaboration on projects.
- Plans are renewed on a yearly basis.
- Technical Support is included as part of the subscription.
- Service credits are consumed when you use certain services in Esri's cloud, such as geocoding, hosted feature or tile services, or spatial analysis.
I like the interface that GIS uses. Specifically the Desktop version (I mainly use ArcMap10.2, and ArcCatalog,). I find Arc products to be very consistent, and as such, I feel comfortable using the various software in different situations. Its is also...
It is hard to learn, not user friendly, and the GUI leads to slow work processes.
Great piece of software overall. Relatively easy to use with a simple interface and a good array of features. Made my analysis of soil assay result interpretation a lot easier and quicker than if they had had to be drawn out by hand (always did a random...
well , its a long list ,, inspite of a lot of flexebeilty with Mapbasic ,, there is a limitation when u use a network lecince ,, for example , hot keys , shortcust is suck in here , so i wrote a script which is good in my home ,, but i cant use it in my...
I like the interface that GIS uses. Specifically the Desktop version (I mainly use ArcMap10.2, and ArcCatalog,). I find Arc products to be very consistent, and as such, I feel comfortable using the various software in different situations. Its is also...
Great piece of software overall. Relatively easy to use with a simple interface and a good array of features. Made my analysis of soil assay result interpretation a lot easier and quicker than if they had had to be drawn out by hand (always did a random...
It is hard to learn, not user friendly, and the GUI leads to slow work processes.
well , its a long list ,, inspite of a lot of flexebeilty with Mapbasic ,, there is a limitation when u use a network lecince ,, for example , hot keys , shortcust is suck in here , so i wrote a script which is good in my home ,, but i cant use it in my...
