Compare Drupal and OpenText TeamSite 
- Users report that Drupal excels in content authoring with a score of 8.3, while OpenText TeamSite trails slightly behind at 7.4. Reviewers mention that Drupal's rich text editor is particularly user-friendly, making it easier for content creators to produce high-quality content.
- Reviewers mention that Drupal's customizable templated workflows score an impressive 8.3, allowing for greater flexibility in managing content processes. In contrast, OpenText TeamSite's workflows are less customizable, which users say can hinder efficiency in content management.
- G2 users highlight Drupal's strong user community with a score of 8.5, which provides extensive support and resources. Users on G2 report that OpenText TeamSite's community is less active, scoring only 5.3, leading to fewer available resources for troubleshooting and best practices.
- Users say that Drupal's SEO capabilities are robust, scoring 8.1, which helps improve site visibility. In comparison, OpenText TeamSite's SEO features are rated lower at 6.7, with reviewers mentioning that this can impact the effectiveness of marketing efforts.
- Reviewers mention that Drupal offers superior enterprise scalability with a score of 8.4, making it a better choice for growing businesses. OpenText TeamSite, while still scalable, scores 7.3, which some users say may not meet the needs of rapidly expanding enterprises.
- Users report that Drupal's API and integrations score 8.1, allowing for seamless connectivity with other tools and platforms. In contrast, OpenText TeamSite's integrations are rated lower at 5.9, which users say can limit functionality and hinder workflow efficiency.
One of the few open source project whichbhas seen such wide adoption by enterprises
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
TeamSite is in use at some extremely large environments. The scalability of TeamSite allows tens and even hundreds of projects on the same development server and push to disparate runtime environments independently.
It's a costly total cost of ownership. The package itself is expensive to purchase and own. It built on a platform that is not easy to support - you'll need specialized skill sets to configure it and support it. Its doesnt play well with many other...
One of the few open source project whichbhas seen such wide adoption by enterprises
TeamSite is in use at some extremely large environments. The scalability of TeamSite allows tens and even hundreds of projects on the same development server and push to disparate runtime environments independently.
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
It's a costly total cost of ownership. The package itself is expensive to purchase and own. It built on a platform that is not easy to support - you'll need specialized skill sets to configure it and support it. Its doesnt play well with many other...
