Compare Drupal and Joomla 
- Users report that Drupal excels in "User, Role, and Access Management," scoring 8.5 compared to Joomla's 8.6, indicating that both platforms offer robust user management features, but Joomla slightly edges out in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Joomla's "Breadth of Pre-Built Templates" is a standout feature, with a score of 8.0, while Drupal's score of 7.1 suggests that Joomla provides a more extensive selection of templates for users looking to quickly set up their sites.
- G2 users highlight that both platforms have similar scores in "Content Authoring," with Drupal at 8.3 and Joomla at 8.5, but Joomla's slightly higher score indicates a more user-friendly experience for content creators.
- Users on G2 report that Drupal's "Customization" capabilities are impressive, scoring 8.3, which allows for extensive tailoring of websites, while Joomla's score of 8.4 shows it also offers strong customization options, but with a slight edge to Joomla.
- Reviewers say that in terms of "Ease of Setup," Joomla outperforms Drupal with a score of 7.9 compared to Drupal's 6.6, suggesting that Joomla is generally easier for new users to get started with.
- Users say that both platforms have solid "Quality of Support," with Drupal scoring 7.4 and Joomla at 7.3, indicating that while both provide decent support, Drupal may have a slight advantage in user satisfaction regarding assistance.
Drupal is far more flexible than any other CMS I've ever used. You can build pretty much anything with it if you apply best practices and sensible architecture. People say Drupal is complicated but they are referring to the developer experience. For an...
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
It provides control and personalisation to your website.The vast liberaries of templates provide all new different looks to your website and the extensions presented by Joomla allow you to have different functionalities. Creating websites is easy with...
If I compare joomla to another free CMS such as umbraco, I feel like it has a lot of shortcomings. And as someone who easily understood sitecore, kentico, and umbraco, joomla was very confusing until I did some reading and research. It isn't organized in a...
Drupal is far more flexible than any other CMS I've ever used. You can build pretty much anything with it if you apply best practices and sensible architecture. People say Drupal is complicated but they are referring to the developer experience. For an...
It provides control and personalisation to your website.The vast liberaries of templates provide all new different looks to your website and the extensions presented by Joomla allow you to have different functionalities. Creating websites is easy with...
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
If I compare joomla to another free CMS such as umbraco, I feel like it has a lot of shortcomings. And as someone who easily understood sitecore, kentico, and umbraco, joomla was very confusing until I did some reading and research. It isn't organized in a...
