Compare Drupal and Ibexa DXP 
- Users report that Drupal excels in customization with a score of 8.3, allowing for extensive tailoring of features and workflows, while Ibexa DXP, with a score of 8.6, also offers strong customization but is noted for its more user-friendly interface.
- Reviewers mention that Drupal's content authoring capabilities are robust, scoring 8.3, which includes a solid rich text editor at 7.8, whereas Ibexa DXP provides a slightly better versioning feature at 8.6, making it easier to manage content revisions.
- G2 users highlight that Drupal's automated publishing feature scores an impressive 8.5, streamlining content distribution, while Ibexa DXP's automated publishing capabilities are less emphasized, indicating a potential area for improvement.
- Users on G2 report that Drupal has a strong user community with a score of 8.5, which can be beneficial for support and resources, while Ibexa DXP's community engagement is lower at 6.0, suggesting less peer support.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have strong SEO capabilities, with Drupal scoring 8.1 and Ibexa DXP at 7.4, but Drupal's flexibility in navigation structures (8.0) is often praised for enhancing user experience and searchability.
- Users say that while both platforms offer API / integrations, Drupal's score of 8.1 indicates a more extensive range of integration options compared to Ibexa DXP's 8.5, which is still commendable but may not be as comprehensive.
- Advanced Content and Product Information management
The best thing about Drupal is the flexibility and complex functionality available for developing a site without necessarily knowing advanced PHP and Javascript. Major projects can be accomplished with Drupal where other CMS's could not even come close to...
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
There are many thing I like about eZ. First of all its open source which offers more innovation and efficiency when implementing web solutions on top of it. At the same time the end client has, optionally, enterprise level support to lower the risk....
Interface for selecting content and custom tags in content blocks, no embeddable custom form designer, coupling with YUI for new backoffice component
The best thing about Drupal is the flexibility and complex functionality available for developing a site without necessarily knowing advanced PHP and Javascript. Major projects can be accomplished with Drupal where other CMS's could not even come close to...
There are many thing I like about eZ. First of all its open source which offers more innovation and efficiency when implementing web solutions on top of it. At the same time the end client has, optionally, enterprise level support to lower the risk....
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
Interface for selecting content and custom tags in content blocks, no embeddable custom form designer, coupling with YUI for new backoffice component
