Compare Design Pickle and Kimp 
- Users report that Design Pickle excels in "Professionalism" with a score of 9.3, indicating a high level of reliability and trustworthiness in their service, while Kimp's score of 8.5 suggests room for improvement in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Design Pickle's "Responsiveness" is rated at 9.1, which users appreciate for quick turnaround times, whereas Kimp, with a score of 8.7, may not always meet the same expectations for speed.
- G2 users highlight that Design Pickle's "Quality of Work" is rated at 8.5, with many praising the consistency and creativity of the designs, while Kimp's lower score of 7.7 indicates that some users feel the quality may vary more significantly.
- Users on G2 note that Design Pickle's "Execution Ability" is rated at 8.6, reflecting a strong capability to deliver projects as promised, while Kimp's score of 8.0 suggests that they may face challenges in executing projects effectively.
- Reviewers say that Design Pickle's "Planning" capabilities, particularly in "Needs Assessment" and "Resource Allocation," are rated highly at 9.0 and 9.1 respectively, which users find beneficial for project success, while Kimp does not provide specific ratings in these areas, leaving some uncertainty.
- Users report that Design Pickle's "Go Live Support" is rated at 9.2, indicating robust support during the implementation phase, while Kimp's lack of detailed feedback in this area may lead to concerns about their support during critical project launches.
- Graphic Design
- Custom Illustrations
- Canva File Delivery
- Unlimited Requests
- Unlimited Revisions
- Unlimited Brands
Generally easy to use, the description and communication takes some fine tuning.
The interface, the exhaustive constant barrage of messages basically telling you to do it yourself. The refund policy is ludicrous. The design was awful. The amount of excess crap you need to doeload to function. The exorbitant time to do simple task. The...
The price was cheaper than the rest and it was easy to use.
Most everything. They were not creatives, designs were not great. A couple of times they would copy from another design they gave and and forgot to even edit the text so it was clear they copied. they were not fast or efficient and didn't correct themselves...
Generally easy to use, the description and communication takes some fine tuning.
The price was cheaper than the rest and it was easy to use.
The interface, the exhaustive constant barrage of messages basically telling you to do it yourself. The refund policy is ludicrous. The design was awful. The amount of excess crap you need to doeload to function. The exorbitant time to do simple task. The...
Most everything. They were not creatives, designs were not great. A couple of times they would copy from another design they gave and and forgot to even edit the text so it was clear they copied. they were not fast or efficient and didn't correct themselves...
