Compare Descartes Aljex and Turvo 
- Users report that Descartes Aljex excels in Load Optimization with a score of 9.3, while Turvo falls short with a score of 7.5. Reviewers mention that Aljex's advanced algorithms significantly enhance efficiency in load planning.
- Reviewers say that Turvo shines in Route Planning, scoring 9.2 compared to Aljex's 8.8. Users on G2 highlight Turvo's intuitive interface that simplifies the route optimization process.
- G2 users note that Descartes Aljex offers superior Carrier Selection capabilities, scoring 9.2, while Turvo scores 8.3. Reviewers mention that Aljex provides comprehensive carrier data, making it easier to choose the best options.
- Users say that both products perform well in Tracking, with Descartes Aljex scoring 9.2 and Turvo at 9.0. However, reviewers mention that Aljex's tracking features are more robust, providing real-time updates that enhance visibility.
- Reviewers mention that Descartes Aljex has a higher Quality of Support rating at 9.0 compared to Turvo's 8.6. Users report that Aljex's support team is responsive and knowledgeable, which is crucial for resolving issues quickly.
- Users on G2 highlight that Descartes Aljex has a better Product Direction score of 9.5, while Turvo's score is 8.3. Reviewers say that Aljex's commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates is a significant advantage for long-term users.
- Basic Accounting
- Basic Customer Management
- Basic Operations
It is easy to use with so simple UI but at the same time, we have every option we need at our fingertips. It makes my tasks so much less time consuming. Further tracking is available on the load page only. BOLs and RCs are just a click away. I use it daily...
When you compare this software to other TMS softwares then it is somewhat lacking in many areas. The main area that needs improvement is the UI. Pretty outdated and one would think that due to this the software would be smooth, but that is simply not the...
I do like that the drivers can update the loads. Makes for less work.
Their is not much bad about this solution. Additional costs in bill when add into our ERP system.but it's not a complaint. They keep getting better to make their and our business better.
It is easy to use with so simple UI but at the same time, we have every option we need at our fingertips. It makes my tasks so much less time consuming. Further tracking is available on the load page only. BOLs and RCs are just a click away. I use it daily...
I do like that the drivers can update the loads. Makes for less work.
When you compare this software to other TMS softwares then it is somewhat lacking in many areas. The main area that needs improvement is the UI. Pretty outdated and one would think that due to this the software would be smooth, but that is simply not the...
Their is not much bad about this solution. Additional costs in bill when add into our ERP system.but it's not a complaint. They keep getting better to make their and our business better.
