Compare Clio and Juris® 
- Users report that Juris® has a solid time tracking feature with a score of 9.1, which is praised for its accuracy and ease of use, while Clio also excels in this area with a score of 8.8, but some users mention that it could benefit from more customization options.
- Reviewers mention that Clio's billing functionality stands out with a score of 9.0, highlighting its seamless integration with payment systems, whereas Juris® scores slightly lower at 8.8, with some users noting that its billing process can be more cumbersome.
- G2 users indicate that Clio's cloud capabilities are superior, scoring 9.0, which allows for better accessibility and collaboration, while Juris® scores 8.8, with reviewers mentioning that it lacks some advanced cloud features that enhance mobility.
- Users on G2 report that Clio's ease of use is a significant advantage, scoring 9.0, with many praising its intuitive interface, while Juris® scores 7.9, with some users expressing that its interface feels outdated and less user-friendly.
- Reviewers say that Juris® has a robust document management system with a score of 8.3, but Clio shines brighter with a score of 8.2, where users appreciate its advanced search and retrieval features, making document handling more efficient.
- Users report that Clio's quality of support is exceptional, scoring 9.2, with many highlighting the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while Juris® scores 8.3, with some users mentioning longer wait times for assistance.
- Accurately track time and expenses. Bill hourly, flat fee, or contingency.
- Make it easy for clients to pay online using credit, debit, or eCheck (US).
- Manage cases, tasks, documents, and calendars, all in one place.
Intuitive interface - it is easy to learn to use this product with reasonable proficiency. Responsive support when you need it - chat and phone. Flexibility provided by numerous integrations - lets you add functionality not offered by the primary program....
very little customization available, billing is not very good, reminders and tasks are very basic
The ease of looking up case law is unparalleled in other legal research programs. The tutorials that are available are helpful for young attorneys who have been out of school for a bit and need to adapt from the student version to the juris version.
PCLaw is server-based, so you have to pay several hundred dollars per user license and you have to install PCLaw on a computer server if you want to enable multiple users to access it, or install it on a desktop computer if you want one user to be able to...
Intuitive interface - it is easy to learn to use this product with reasonable proficiency. Responsive support when you need it - chat and phone. Flexibility provided by numerous integrations - lets you add functionality not offered by the primary program....
The ease of looking up case law is unparalleled in other legal research programs. The tutorials that are available are helpful for young attorneys who have been out of school for a bit and need to adapt from the student version to the juris version.
very little customization available, billing is not very good, reminders and tasks are very basic
PCLaw is server-based, so you have to pay several hundred dollars per user license and you have to install PCLaw on a computer server if you want to enable multiple users to access it, or install it on a desktop computer if you want one user to be able to...
