Compare Canvas LMS and Watermark Planning & Self-Study 
- Users report that Canvas LMS excels in its automated grading feature, scoring 8.6, which allows for efficient assessment of student submissions, while Watermark Planning & Self-Study lags behind with a score of 7.4, making grading less streamlined.
- Reviewers mention that Canvas LMS offers a robust analytics dashboard with a score of 8.8, providing detailed insights into student performance, whereas Watermark's dashboard, scoring 8.3, is perceived as less comprehensive.
- G2 users highlight that Canvas LMS shines in gamification with a score of 8.1, enhancing student engagement through interactive elements, while Watermark's gamification features are rated significantly lower at 6.4, indicating a less engaging experience.
- Users on G2 appreciate Canvas LMS for its mobile compatibility, scoring 8.5, which allows learners to access content on-the-go, while Watermark Planning & Self-Study's mobile functionality is rated lower at 7.6, potentially limiting accessibility.
- Reviewers say that Canvas LMS provides a more user-friendly course builder, making it easier for instructors to create and manage courses, while Watermark's course authoring tools are seen as less intuitive, impacting the overall user experience.
- Users report that Canvas LMS has a higher score for personalized learning paths at 8.6, allowing for tailored educational experiences, compared to Watermark's offerings, which may not provide the same level of customization.
The first thing I noticed with this product was the the interface was very user friendly! I liked that I was able to create a full profile with a photo that other users could see and get information from. The grade feature was also very helpful in...
Canvas is not fully accessible to students with specific learning difficulties, visual and hearing impairments. Some students use government funded assistive software (e.g. text to speech) for which they have had hours of training and discovered an optimum...
The Watermark SL&L Team is very helpful. Most components of the SL&L software are intuitive, and I especially like the professional look of the e-portfolios. This is the only option I've found that provides assessment, e-portfolios AND fieldwork management...
I dislike the forced structure that is hard to work with. When the material is written and organized by others, it means that individual or personal elements disappear, and unique file materials cannot easily be added. The software itself has a clunkiness...
The first thing I noticed with this product was the the interface was very user friendly! I liked that I was able to create a full profile with a photo that other users could see and get information from. The grade feature was also very helpful in...
The Watermark SL&L Team is very helpful. Most components of the SL&L software are intuitive, and I especially like the professional look of the e-portfolios. This is the only option I've found that provides assessment, e-portfolios AND fieldwork management...
Canvas is not fully accessible to students with specific learning difficulties, visual and hearing impairments. Some students use government funded assistive software (e.g. text to speech) for which they have had hours of training and discovered an optimum...
I dislike the forced structure that is hard to work with. When the material is written and organized by others, it means that individual or personal elements disappear, and unique file materials cannot easily be added. The software itself has a clunkiness...
