Compare Bynder Webdam and CONTENTdm 
- Users report that Bynder Webdam excels in its File Types support, scoring 8.7, which allows for a wide variety of formats, while CONTENTdm follows closely with a score of 8.5, indicating solid but slightly less diverse support.
- Reviewers mention that CONTENTdm shines in Metadata management, achieving a score of 9.0, which is higher than Bynder Webdam's 8.4, suggesting that CONTENTdm offers more robust options for organizing and retrieving assets.
- G2 users highlight that Bynder Webdam's Versioning feature is rated at 8.4, providing effective control over asset revisions, whereas CONTENTdm's score of 7.4 indicates a less comprehensive versioning system.
- Users on G2 report that both platforms have similar scores for File Preview functionality, with Bynder Webdam at 7.8 and CONTENTdm at 8.1, but reviewers mention that CONTENTdm's preview capabilities are slightly more user-friendly.
- Reviewers say that Bynder Webdam's Integration with Creative Software is rated at 7.7, which is lower than CONTENTdm's impressive score of 8.7, indicating that CONTENTdm may offer better compatibility with design tools.
- Users report that both platforms have comparable scores for Quality of Support, with both scoring 8.0, but reviewers mention that Bynder Webdam has a more responsive support team, enhancing the overall user experience.
Ease of use! webDAM has all of the functionality necessary to manage all of our digital assets. It is easy to use so we have not had problems with our end users or our internal team learning to use it. I also really like the formatting functionality when...
Cursor is not already in the user name box when you open the login page. Sometimes some of the photo thumbnails don't show up. Photos take a long time to process after uploading. The Watermark is hard to change.
* CONTENTdm allows us to display the Library's digitized historical materials on a single platform. The public interface is fairly easy to use and allows visitors to view digital objects, download web-quality copies, share them on social media and comment...
The cost is pretty substantial for a small-scale repository, so it may simply be better to go with another option unless you are "piggy-backing" off of another institution's setup. When we used it, we had little control over features and formatting of...
Ease of use! webDAM has all of the functionality necessary to manage all of our digital assets. It is easy to use so we have not had problems with our end users or our internal team learning to use it. I also really like the formatting functionality when...
* CONTENTdm allows us to display the Library's digitized historical materials on a single platform. The public interface is fairly easy to use and allows visitors to view digital objects, download web-quality copies, share them on social media and comment...
Cursor is not already in the user name box when you open the login page. Sometimes some of the photo thumbnails don't show up. Photos take a long time to process after uploading. The Watermark is hard to change.
The cost is pretty substantial for a small-scale repository, so it may simply be better to go with another option unless you are "piggy-backing" off of another institution's setup. When we used it, we had little control over features and formatting of...
