Compare Butter CMS and Prismic 
- Users report that Butter CMS excels in its "Quality of Support," with a score of 9.6, indicating that users find the support team highly responsive and helpful, while Prismic's support quality is rated significantly lower at 8.1.
- Reviewers mention that Butter CMS offers a superior "Ease of Use" experience, scoring 9.2 compared to Prismic's 8.4, making it more accessible for small businesses and users without extensive technical backgrounds.
- G2 users highlight Butter CMS's "Automated Publishing" feature, which received a score of 9.0, as a standout capability that simplifies content management, whereas Prismic's similar feature is rated lower at 8.3.
- Users on G2 appreciate Butter CMS's "Content Authoring" capabilities, scoring 9.2, which allows for a more intuitive and efficient content creation process compared to Prismic's offerings.
- Reviewers say that Butter CMS's "Customizable Templated Workflows" and "Asset Management" features, with scores of 8.9 and 8.1 respectively, provide a more tailored experience for users, while Prismic's asset management is perceived as less flexible.
- Users report that Butter CMS's "Personalization" features are rated at 9.0, allowing for more targeted content delivery, while Prismic's personalization capabilities are rated lower at 7.5, indicating a potential gap in user experience.
- Enterprise-class SLA
- Multiple Environments
- Multiple Sites
- 1 User
- 2 Locales
- 100 GB of built-in CDN /month
Simple to config, easy to use. The doc is very clear and the api very fast. I think this is the most easy api I had to use for the past three years and I'm going to tell everyone to use it when they want to create a simple blog application even a complex...
On the big picture, the graphical interface has improved, but I don't feel comfortable with the new Collections landing page. I would like to land on the page and have the items already divided by collection. For what concerns the single item of a...
It's free to get started, and even when you have more users the plans are pretty cheap. It's always quick in production and provides a really flexible and powerful solution to manage all of our content.
The API is not well documented and it is hard to understand a few things at the beginning and can easily lead you in the wrong direction as to how to generate html from the api.
Simple to config, easy to use. The doc is very clear and the api very fast. I think this is the most easy api I had to use for the past three years and I'm going to tell everyone to use it when they want to create a simple blog application even a complex...
It's free to get started, and even when you have more users the plans are pretty cheap. It's always quick in production and provides a really flexible and powerful solution to manage all of our content.
On the big picture, the graphical interface has improved, but I don't feel comfortable with the new Collections landing page. I would like to land on the page and have the items already divided by collection. For what concerns the single item of a...
The API is not well documented and it is hard to understand a few things at the beginning and can easily lead you in the wrong direction as to how to generate html from the api.
