Hygraph Reviews & Product Details

Hygraph makes managing content really easy, especially with its flexible setup and GraphQL API. The interface is clean and intuitive, and I love how you can customize content structures to fit exactly what you need. Plus, it integrates well with other tools, which is a huge bonus. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It takes a little time to get used to, especially if you're new to GraphQL or structured content models. The pricing can feel a bit steep for smaller projects, and some of the more advanced features are locked behind higher-tier plans. Customer support is generally good, but response times can be a bit inconsistent. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Overall, I have been very impressed and very happy with using HyGraph. The UI is simple and clean, yet the product is very configurable and supports some very poweful functionality. Being able to add components to the content schema is a game changer.

We have been able to implement live preview and staging content delivery very easily. Hygraph has also connected very easily to our frontend modules allowing for easy integration.

During our time with Hygraph, the support we have received has been very friendly and super helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think that HyGraph needs to strike a happy balance between targetting development teams and mareting teams. There are probably parts of HyGraph which could seem a bit too developer focused. There are some small UI changes I would like to see implemented. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Als Software Architekt schätze ich die Flexibilität der Lösung und die Unterstützung des Unternehmens bei der Umsetzung. Aus der Community kommen regelmäßig neue Insights und Erfahrungsberichte, die einen bei der Umsetzung inspirieren. Das gesamte Rollenkonzept zur Administrierung kann sich sehen lassen. Wir laufen als Unternehmen mit fast 50 aktiven Accounts mit der Lösung sehr gut. Mein Tip: Greifen sie gleich zu Beginn auf die Hilfe des Unternehmens zu, ein Solutions Architect kann bei der Umsetzung wunder bewirken. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Die Erweiterungen in Form von Apps sollten auch durch ein Projekt administierbar sein und nicht nur durch einen Nutzer. Das schützt davor, dass Apps im Anwenungslifecycle verloren gehen. ( Wir hatten das Problem und konnten es innerhalb von 24 stunden durch das Team von HyGraph lösen. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hygraph is an incredibly flexible headless CMS, making it easy to manage structured content across multiple platforms. The GraphQL API is powerful and efficient, allowing seamless data retrieval without unnecessary overhead. The interface is intuitive, and the ability to define custom models and relationships makes content management highly scalable. It’s a great choice for developers and marketers alike! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UX and UI could be more intuitive, especially for non-technical users like copywriters. Some aspects of the interface feel more tailored to developers, which can make content management a bit challenging for those without a technical background. A more user-friendly experience with improved navigation and editing tools would make it even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hygraph is a fast and efficient tool for managing content. The platform runs smoothly and reliably, which makes content management simple for both developers and content creators. Plus, our whole team got used to it really quickly, so the transition was super easy. The API with GraphQL is exactly what I was looking for. In the future, Hygraph will definitely be my first choice when it comes to this type of solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Basing the API entirely on GraphQL might not suit everyone. Additionally, from what I remember, content translations were locked behind a paid plan, which could be a drawback for teams needing multilingual support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

With the Hygraph i can set up content structures independently without waiting for other content team member to update. Plus, its APIs are more stable and don’t break easily, even if someone from my team makes changes, which helps for faster progress in my project. While initial stage of my project i found it very easy to setup the initials for my project using Hygraph. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I had switched to Hygraph from another CMS. It caused me to rework on my content models and migrate data of my existing application to use the new APIs. I find it very difficult while migrating my project to Hygraph CMS. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hygraph's interface is clean and pretty easy to navigate which is good when introducing new team members. Setting up and managing content is straightforward, and the GraphQL API makes querying data efficient. It’s a great balance between flexibility and usability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hygraph seems to lack built-in templates or pre-made components, so teams need front-end development experience. This can slow things down if content teams need to rely on developers for implementation. So seeing more pre-made components can improve this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best thing for me about Hygraph is flexibility and comfort. Manages contents both at ease within a system as well as across multiple channels. Our Staffs meetings are trouble-free. Its api and capacity easily design this project ready from small->large alternatives and fits all long-term flexibility considering requirements changes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Something I dont like about Hygraph is that its highest plans are limited and then tend to get ridiculously expensive as the project grows. Also while it's intuitive exploring some of the more advanced features has steep learning curves and may take a little extra time and effort to really learn and use properly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

i think one of the reasons why i enjoy this is that it can help you in a way that's suited to your needs. The platform makes it easy to integrate content across multiple channels. Im impressed with the customizable element allowing me to make content exactly how i need it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I dont like the fact that some of the advanced features can be purchased for higher tier plans. That would cost you as your project is scaled out. Some advanced configurations may take some time to become acquaint with. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In my view, this makes Hygraph's GraphQL API probably the best aspect: it allows data to be queried in a much more precise way-efficient enough for the developer to really fetch what he needs. This gives the flexibility to build web applications with better performance with features more suited to the requirement. Like the traditional CMS focusing on REST APIs, GraphQL has the added advantage of a single endpoint through which those multiple API calls can be reduced, together with some of the pain points for its integration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

"As a result of the whole over-importance that is given to developers, which makes it really difficult for the first steps of any user, especially for content editors without any technical background, my primary dislike about Hygraph is its lack of really introducing itself into this developing world of market-ready content. Even though it is meant to be as intuitive as it appears, managing your content, creating your API, or developing complex content models may take some time for a GraphQL or Headless CMS newbie to grasp." That, by the way, is my personal dislike. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.