Compare Archbee and ReadMe 
- Users report that ReadMe excels in its API Contracts feature, scoring a remarkable 9.8, which reviewers mention is crucial for developers needing clear and concise API documentation. In contrast, Archbee's API Contracts received a lower score, indicating it may not meet the same level of detail and clarity.
- Reviewers mention that Archbee shines in Quality of Support, with a score of 9.1, highlighting responsive customer service and helpful resources. In comparison, ReadMe's support quality is rated lower at 8.5, suggesting that users may experience longer wait times or less effective assistance.
- G2 users note that ReadMe's Versioning and Version History feature is highly rated at 9.6, allowing teams to track changes effectively. Archbee, however, received a score of 8.6 in this area, which users say may lead to confusion when managing document revisions.
- Users on G2 report that ReadMe's Searchable knowledge base feature is exceptional, scoring 9.8, making it easy for users to find information quickly. Archbee's searchable feature, rated at 9.2, is still good but may not be as efficient for users needing rapid access to documentation.
- Reviewers mention that Archbee's Link Sharing functionality is rated at 9.0, which users find beneficial for collaboration. In contrast, ReadMe's score of 8.9 indicates it may not offer the same level of ease in sharing links among team members.
- Users say that ReadMe's Import feature is rated highly at 9.0, allowing for seamless integration of existing documentation. Archbee's lower score of 7.8 suggests that users may face challenges when trying to import their content into the platform.
- API Reference
- 3 Published Versions
- Markdown-based Editor
Licensing structure, Intuitive interface, templates and modular approach to writing content with blocks.
This tool is incredibly frustrating to use. It is plagued with bugs that both impact the editor experience but also ultimately impact the end-user/viewer's experience.
The ability for our users to test our APIs right in the developer hub is extremely useful. In addition to that, being able to provide developers with recipes that guide them on how to develop more challenging concepts & features is very valuable. Readme...
I feel like these guys are winging it. Support has been horrible from day one. They'll see your request and simply not respond; will tell you reported bugs are being worked on but will never get to fix them. Their newest product, Metrics, was launched a...
Licensing structure, Intuitive interface, templates and modular approach to writing content with blocks.
The ability for our users to test our APIs right in the developer hub is extremely useful. In addition to that, being able to provide developers with recipes that guide them on how to develop more challenging concepts & features is very valuable. Readme...
This tool is incredibly frustrating to use. It is plagued with bugs that both impact the editor experience but also ultimately impact the end-user/viewer's experience.
I feel like these guys are winging it. Support has been horrible from day one. They'll see your request and simply not respond; will tell you reported bugs are being worked on but will never get to fix them. Their newest product, Metrics, was launched a...
