Users report that Macabacus excels in automation features, particularly with its "Automation" capabilities rated at 9.0, allowing for streamlined workflows and efficient document generation, while Apache OpenOffice Math falls short in this area with a lower overall user satisfaction.
Reviewers mention that Macabacus has a significantly higher ease of setup score of 9.0 compared to Apache OpenOffice Math, which indicates that users find it easier to implement and start using Macabacus right away.
G2 users highlight the superior quality of support provided by Macabacus, scoring 8.1, which is notably better than the 5.5 score for Apache OpenOffice Math, suggesting that users feel more supported and valued with Macabacus.
Users on G2 emphasize that Macabacus has a strong performance in document assembly with a score of 6.7, while Apache OpenOffice Math does not provide the same level of functionality, making Macabacus a better choice for users needing robust document management features.
Reviewers mention that Macabacus has a higher rating for meeting requirements at 9.1, indicating that it aligns better with user needs compared to Apache OpenOffice Math's score of 7.4, which suggests a gap in fulfilling user expectations.
Users say that Macabacus shines in its integration capabilities, particularly with "System of Record Integration" and "APIs," which are crucial for businesses looking to connect their software with other tools, while Apache OpenOffice Math lacks in this area, limiting its usability in a broader tech ecosystem.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache OpenOffice Math
No pricing available
Macabacus
Enterprise
Contact Us
1 user Per Month
Enterprise features and advanced collaboration capabilities for high-performing teams take productivity and brand compliance to the next level
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.