When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Apache log4j easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Splunk Enterprise overall.
Debugging and filter are good features in log4j. It's easy to find issue with Log4j. It also help when there are mulltiple error in product. It's easy to debug using log4j
I really dont dislike anything specifically. It depends on the Apache configuration that you have
Splunk is a fantastic tool that we depend on. It isn't just development work we rely on Splunk for, but we also use it for testing engineering changes as a standard before production releases. From ease-of-use, forwarding data from a variety of data...
The query language is not intuitive and can feel difficult to use. Graphing and charting isn't easy to use either, though it seems like it could be a nice feature.
Debugging and filter are good features in log4j. It's easy to find issue with Log4j. It also help when there are mulltiple error in product. It's easy to debug using log4j
Splunk is a fantastic tool that we depend on. It isn't just development work we rely on Splunk for, but we also use it for testing engineering changes as a standard before production releases. From ease-of-use, forwarding data from a variety of data...
I really dont dislike anything specifically. It depends on the Apache configuration that you have
The query language is not intuitive and can feel difficult to use. Graphing and charting isn't easy to use either, though it seems like it could be a nice feature.