For some time now, I have been using Acronis products and the experience with Acronis Disaster Recovery has been as successful as with the other products. The implementation of the system was very simple, it has a unique and intuitive interface that...
With so many functionalities, it is a complex platform and quite costly for our volume. Also the performance is sometimes not good both for the copies and for the restorations.
I'm a huge fan of the Unitrends backup appliance from a hardware perspective. I find the concept of tapes outdated and like being able to "rack and back" with the hardware and then replicate to an offsite DR location.
* Disk to Disk archive using their RXDA ESATA appliance has horrible performance and just is not an option * Support tried to fix our issues, but they couldn't, support tickets since have been closed out without a valid solution or validation that the...
For some time now, I have been using Acronis products and the experience with Acronis Disaster Recovery has been as successful as with the other products. The implementation of the system was very simple, it has a unique and intuitive interface that...
I'm a huge fan of the Unitrends backup appliance from a hardware perspective. I find the concept of tapes outdated and like being able to "rack and back" with the hardware and then replicate to an offsite DR location.
With so many functionalities, it is a complex platform and quite costly for our volume. Also the performance is sometimes not good both for the copies and for the restorations.
* Disk to Disk archive using their RXDA ESATA appliance has horrible performance and just is not an option * Support tried to fix our issues, but they couldn't, support tickets since have been closed out without a valid solution or validation that the...