302 out of 303 Total Reviews for Prismic
Overall Review Sentiment for Prismic
Log in to view review sentiment.
Prismic has helped us craft unique content sitewide, powered by our content team and not developers. Being able to use prismic for wiki data, blog posts, FAQs, terms/privacy policies, marketing pages, etc has been a huge benefit to our team.
Being able to create content types, with custom fields organized how I need them, has been a huge reason I've stuck with Prismic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The strong nature of resistance I've received from support when discussing issues with them. Seem often to brush us off, instead of work with us to solve problems.
The entire way media is handled is frustrating. Being able to upload, browse media, and assign meta details to each item... and then using it in a post is fantastic. But if you make changes to the item after using it, it doesn't propagate.
Same with thumbnails, if you add a new page/style/design to your site, you need to manually go to each and every post and reapply the image, to generate a new round of thumbnails.
It's incredibly tedious, and support has offered no better way insisting that is the option. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I am using Prismic on a daily basis. We have switched to it from WordPress and I must say that it is much more user-friendly. The whole team can easily adjust pages on our website without needing too much of an onboarding.
Since the frontend and the backend are separated, the team cannot make unwanted changes easily (like it was possible with WordPress).
Overall, our content production has been much more efficient since using Prismic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Honestly, the content editor could use some more work. The editor is missing some basic functions like the ability to create nested lists and tables.
Also, there are some other limitations that CMS systems like WordPress solve with plugins like setting redirects or YoastSEO for checking meta information.
Plugins are not available in Prismic, so you have to deal with what's already there or have your web devs customize it for you. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I appreciate the ease of use of their features, specifically for marketers who are not very technical. It's easy to update website pages and add resources to your site. All the core functionality you need is available. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I wish there were more customization capabilities in a WISIWYG editor so that engineering support was not needed to go above and beyond with your website. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
- Easy to navigate docs - by following the documentation, launching a new project is dead simple. Same goes for learning about the service and tools at my disposal.
- Great development experience - no other headless CMS tool comes close to Prismic and its Slice Machine. Easy to use, implement and integrate with popular frameworks. Onboarding new developers is not an issue since Prismic is so intuitive.
- Fantastic SDKs that do their job effectively and efficiently.
- Very generous free plan - covers basic website needs. I've launched several websites on free plan only!
- Actively maintained - from my years of using Prismic almost daily, it's fascinating to see how much better Prismic becomes with time, still delivering new major features and QoL improvements. I'm always excited about what's cooking in Prismic's team kitchen! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The things I like about Prismic far, FAR outweigh the things that I dislike about Prismic, but nonetheless:
- By design, it won't fit for storing data with requests like users, comments etc. That has to be handled by something else like Firebase.
- Mostly it would be technical quirks here and there, like working with linked documents is still a bit troublesome (TS typings, defining fetchLinks could be better documented for advanced nesting), slice names are tightly related to the slice folder name where they would serve better purpose as display names for marketing team, no slice descriptions like with legacy custom types etc.
- Rich text field could use more love in regards to customization - it can be not enough fe. for some blog use cases. Labels brought that a little bit of that at least, but they can't be used with the new document editor (I have to refer clients to the Legacy Editor as labels still work there)
- From a marketing perspective, even though field organization in a document is still pretty good right now, it could be better (however, as of today, Prismic team is working on it, so I'm excited). Same goes for navigating slices to add - it can be daunting to search through tens or hundreds of slices without being familiar with the repository already. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It was really easy to integrate the CMS with my Nuxt project. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It was a bit hard to setup GSAP scroll triggers with Prismic slices. The slices aren't mounted in the exact order they are on the content manager, which breaks GSAP pinned scroll triggers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What I like best about prismic.io is its intuitive and user-friendly interface that empowers both developers and content creators to manage content effortlessly. The flexibility provided by its headless CMS architecture allows for seamless integration with various technologies, making it easy to deliver dynamic and personalized web experiences. Prismic.io excels in ease of implementation, making it an ideal choice for both small projects and large-scale applications and it is well-documented. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Honestly, there's nothing that I dislike about prismic.io. It offers a seamless and efficient experience for content management and integration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Prismic.io offers a user-friendly interface for content management, making it easy for both developers and content creators to work efficiently. Its headless architecture provides flexibility, allowing content to be deployed across various platforms. The customisable content types and robust API enable seamless integration with different frontend frameworks. Prismic's preview functionality is particularly useful, letting content editors see changes in real-time before publishing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The learning curve can be steep for non-technical users, especially when setting up complex content structures. The search functionality within the CMS could be improved for easier content discovery, especially in larger projects with extensive content libraries. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It's free to get started, and even when you have more users the plans are pretty cheap. It's always quick in production and provides a really flexible and powerful solution to manage all of our content. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Organisation of documents is a bit tricky, and our repo has turned into a bit of a mess because the lack of file structuring options in the platform. The search feature is not ideal, and finding images and other assets is challenging if they weren't uploaded recently. It would really benefit from structuring documents and files better in the UI. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
For me its the simplicity. Also, adding the seo which makes the life of the developer easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I think for the richtextField there are limited things you could do. Perhaps, they might have to enchance it a bit. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
