Top Rated Fusion eClinical Suite EDC Alternatives
57 Fusion eClinical Suite EDC Reviews
Fusion works effectively and dependably in a clinic setting. Fusion is a fantastic program for managing schedules and patient progress reports. Fusion should be used as the primary program for scheduling and paperwork in all clinic settings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The fact that fusion software is first challenging to grasp is its least beneficial quality. There aren't many tutorials or materials available to assist clinicians in setting up fusion. to get quick access to the information about their patients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
That the data is easy to find and to enter. I know exactly where to go to enter all the clinical data. That has been helpful. Also, I like that I have quick acess to the Pre Enrollment log and the ReConsent log and I can run reports and see all the queries. Overall, it has been an easy EDC to implement at my site.
I do love the Customer support! If I have a question, I know I can get an answer quickly. That is great! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I don't like how the Medical History is in the Screening visit only and not a separate tab that I can add to after the Screening Visit for conditions that the patients forgot to tell me at Screening. I also don't like how some of the boxes seem to be marked as required, even when they are not for the visit. There should be more options for data being "Not applicable" instead of just leaving an "X". Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Evan F. Evan F."
The support staff is phenomenal. They are always willing to help with any issue and even discuss workflows. The teams is continuously improving and taking feedback from the clinical sites to make the EDC as effective and efficient as possible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Some processes can be redudnant and my biggest complaint would be the SDR process. Sometimes that can be frustrating when you have to send out multiple communications just to change a data point. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I think Fusion is relatively easy to use and helps organize and manage data especially for clinical trails involving numerous study visits for research subjects. Most of the interface is quite intuitive. It is easy to respond to queries. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Sometimes it is hard to navigate to a specific page in a study visit. For example if I need to upload a file pertaining to a specific visit, it makes me go through all the pages in the visit to reach the final upload page. It would be helpful to be able to go directly into that page. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I like that one website/ portal is used for all aspects of the clinical trial, rather than having multiple portals. It makes it more simple to have everything in one place. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Two users cannot work on the same subject at the same time, slowing down the process of data entry. Once an item is in REV status, we are unable to edit the data without having to contact several people to unfreeze the data. When there are multiple subjects on a study, it is too difficult to edit/ change data or work on the data without jumping through several hoops to answer a single question. Additionally, since the website is still in production, new pages are constantly being added and old subjects who were in completion status are marked as incomplete, making it seem like the data was never completed. Furthermore, our site has noticed that Fushion will delete the data that we enter from time to time, even when they are in SDR. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I like that the platform uses tabs and looks like a file folder. I also like that the pages auto-save. Customer support has always been quick to reply to our problems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There is not a great way to determine what forms still need to be completed. The main issues I have dealt with are likely related to the study specific build and their inexperience. The overall design is a little dated from an aesthetic perspective. The auto-save feature is nice, but if you pause in your typing for more than a few seconds the page will autosave and when you resume typing you have to enter a reason why you are editing your data. I wish the auto-save was less frequent to avoid this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The support team is very responsive and has helped me and my collegues quite a few times.
The basic infrustructure (how different cards are arrenged) is also quite clear. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I think the system is overly complicated and with many hidden glitches that make work of CRAs and clinical staff much harder. For example, if you do not do something in an exact sequence event you might be unable to complete a simple task. If a query is issued only to confirm some value, the site cannot change the value if needed.
I understand some of these limitations are built in for the sake of data integrity, but until we figured some of them out, it was a source of constant frustration.
Out of the ten first patients, for only a few the site team members were successful in correctly assigning the drug vials, even with telephone support from their CRAs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
This is a straight forward EDC that I have used for one research study to date. The General Log concept as a means of communicating with the medical monitor has been nice as everything is well memorialized. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
When making a small typographical correction to an SAE (or several in a row) the system bombards emails with the update. It would be nice if it prompted the user to confirm that the update is complete so that several changes could be made as a single update. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It is relatively easy to use once you get started. The pages are easy to navigate without having to read the manual, if you are short on time. Otherwise, pretty straightforward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The font size is small and there are some icons that do not make intuitive sense. Also, there is no easy access to the number to dial once an interview is scheduled. At least in the confirmation, provide the number. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I like Fusion because everything is located in the one portal. You can find the protocol, training slides, newsletters, IB, central IRB documents, source, and the edc all with logging into one site. It is easy to navigate and user friendly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I have not yet encountered anything that I would say I truly dislike. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.