Top Rated BRYTER Alternatives
73 BRYTER Reviews
Overall Review Sentiment for BRYTER
Log in to view review sentiment.
It is simple and flexible, yet extremely powerful - the platform can be used in many different ways and can be adapted to help with any issue. Everything is easy and it is very intuitive - people who are not technically-minded at all are able to use it very easily. The BRYTER customer support is also absolutely excellent - they have worked closely with us to build the modules and are very responsive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Nothing - there is nothing we dislike and we have no complaints. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The platform is quick and easy to use - and the first iteration of a product can be developed in a matter of hours. The UI is attractive and embeds well into internal platforms. The support offered by the team at BRYTER is first class. They are always at hand to talk through ideas (including running ideation sessions for lawyers internally) and offer support throughout the development cycle on a new module/product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It can be difficult to iterate on BRYTER when managing revisions to long and/or complex decision trees. Such instances can be unavoidable where there are updates to legislation/regulation that impact the output of a module. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Colleagues at Bryter have been extremely helpful with explaining technical solutions to us and providing insight and input on our initial ideas. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I have nothing I disliked, generally, it has been a very pleasant experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Andrada C. Andrada C."
I appreciate the most how the platform gives you the opportunity to automate all processes within an organisation: from recruitment to events management. Although using Bryter is intuitive and made easy by the resources provided in the Help Center, I really like how supportive the staff is in helping with problems you may encounter along the way. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Regarding the overall functionality, it is really hard to pinpoint a downside of using the platform, especially with all the upgrades they made recently. However, one downside would be the fact that it does not support Safari as a browser, so it is harder to see the stats of your application if you don't have a laptop on hand. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Doris W. Doris W."
Onboarding tutorial & module examples give a clear overview of how to map decision-making trees. It makes me realise that I will have to be precise with process mapping to make the module design process as painless as possible.
Clean UI: Auto-tidying of the flow chart whenever nodes are added or changed; dynamic referencing & grouping keeping the graph tidy & manageable during creation & editing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
You can't select which nodes should saving user data for statistics purposes; currently you can only save all data from the entire module or none, which isn't ideal if you want to retain some of the data without dealing with the personal data compliance issues.
It would also be great to provide generic examples that link with BRYTER's numerous use cases, particularly with third-party app integration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
BRYTER's workflow and logic creation is structured in such a way that makes it legible, easy to create branched logic, and highly configurable. If a user needs to use an expression to add functionality to their workflow, they will be familiar with the structure of the expressions, having seen similar examples throughout business applications like Excel. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
When starting out, you should have a clear idea of what the structure of the workflow should be. If you haven't mapped out all the different possibilities or end-points, it can be tricky to go back and add additional branches. Once you're familiar with BRYTER however, this becomes second nature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="David Z. David Z."
We deliver services to large production companies (film & TV production) that have to negotiate repetitive and very individual legal matters with their clients, freelancers and partners every day (rights management, risk assessment, contracting, ... ). Without a tool to automate those individual legal matters, each question had to be dealt with one by one. Implementing BRYTER, our clients automate most of these decisions. Besides speeding up and standardizing processes, this also results in a legal/contractual /routine that allows for tracking, analyzing and managing the resulting contracts (copyright management when reselling productions on an international level). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
We used to build (code) and sell services individually (per task) that we now deliver using BRYTER. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Christopher D. H. Christopher D. H."
What do I like best? The ease of use and the control you have to change and improve the tools you build.
The easy-to-learn and understand interface lets you build a tool with "visual code" in no time. You can add the features and details you want, not just what a finished app/tool provider decided to include on their side. You can go back in whenever you want to make adjustments and improvements on your own. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What could be better? The ability to connect or interface with other systems is more limited than I would like. I know the BRYTER team is adding functionality and options tocommunicate with different programs and platforms, but this is the most limiting factor I see with BRYTER. If a task or job requires an entry into another system or a connection to another program that BRYTER cannot handle, the value BRYTER could bring is reduced, since using a BRYTER tool would still require a manual step or another tool to fill the gap between the systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
BRYTER is an excellent instrument for organizations that are in need - and might not realize to be in need! - to automate their internal processes, but have no programming experts. Through BRYTER, we were able to reduce repetitive tasks significantly, making final results more consistent and our organisation generally more efficient. After a brief introduction, anybody can learn how to quickly build modules and "apps", without knowing anything about coding. And whenever a problem arises, the BRYTER team is ready to catch you and solve it very quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There is not anything I dislike about BRYTER. The only problems that sometimes arise - as with any IT solution - are bugs, but they are always resolved very quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.