Top Rated BP Logix Alternatives
Process Director provides developers with the ability to do just about anything and create efficient and customized processes and fit any need or requirement. The system's flexibility is it's greatest strength. With Process Director you are just about able to do anything you can imagine it, you just need to know the intricacies of the system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The lack of a working internal active directory user sync solution. Throughout our use of the system we've experienced unpredictable results in our user sync, from new users not appearing to users not being deleted to nested groups not being properly populated. This is something the company continues to perfect and have offered other solutions to address the issues but which remove automation of the user sync process.
While it's flexibility is a great strength, and this might be a low code platform, learning how to develop solutions effectively in Process Director has a steep learning curve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
28 out of 29 Total Reviews for BP Logix
Overall Review Sentiment for BP Logix
Log in to view review sentiment.
Prototypes can be swiftly tested by users, who can also offer suggestions. Making modifications is easy, giving developers more time to communicate with customers and improve the product to satisfy their demands. Instead of waiting months, the solution can be fully created and implemented in a few weeks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
We have experienced inconsistent results in our user synchronisation while using the system. These problems can include new users not showing up as anticipated users not being deleted as intended and incorrectly filled nested groups. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Adam G. Adam G."
Easy to create responsive forms. Powerful, easy to configure built in tasks. Quickly prototype a working version of a form and process that is exactly what the users are asking for. Users can easily test prototypes and make suggestions. Changes are relatively easy so you spend more time talking to users and refining to give them what they actually want and need. Fully develop the solution and have in use, in production within a couple weeks , not months. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Documentation could be indexed better. There is usually the exact thing you need well documented somewhere. Finding it is not always easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Robab S. Robab S."
I enjoyed working with BP logic team. They were always ready and willing to help. And I did need a lot of help since my project was outside of their typical use case and needed custom codes or innovative solutions to enable the features that my organization required. I liked the monthly updates and webinars to keep up with the changes. It was easy to learn and use the application. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Some of the training materials were outdated and did not reflect the ongoing changes/updates. I wish they had more example codes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There's a lot to like about the system itself, which we have been able to customize in a multitude of ways to address our needs. But my favorite thing is the great people at BP Logix. They are understanding, responsive, and very happy to work with us as much as possible to ensure we are satisfied. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There are a few small things we would like the system to do that it is not capable of doing. When engineering needs to make more substantive changes, that is typically a long slow process. Recently we have had problems where development and the testing systems have not matched, and that made testing a long, painful process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Vincenzo F. Vincenzo F."
I like how it produces and markets AI enabled low code development platform for custom digital applications. I like that the company provides automation consutling. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There is really nothing to dislike about this product it helps run, build and monitor and improve your business process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
BP Logix has provided us a platform to build a range of automated workflows that have improved efficiency in HR, Accounting, IT, and other administrative functions at the firm. We like that we can have people using one application/dashboard to interact with many processes. The admin departments use custom views to manage the work after a request is approved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Limitations to how arrays of data can be used within forms has caused us to rethink an number of proposed workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Stephen F. Stephen F."
Easy form design, you could use either word document with the plug-in or online editor to create your own form. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
We hope the development team could add a nested array in the array system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The versatility and functionality for form building is great. It has many options that allow you to manipulate the data from forms, as well as a plethora of conditionals and events. I think it's great for a setting that needs lots of forms, such as a university. It also has a pretty extensive process flow option, under the name of a timeline, which is fantastic in many different settings. It can allow a form to proceed through steps based on both conditions and timeframes, which increases the versatility even more. It even allows you to manipulate the data in the form from the timeline itself, which can be useful if you need to change something at a specific step. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I dislike the lack of control over certain things. As a programmer, I sometimes which I could use custom code to get something to work the way I want, but the system is very limited in that regard. You can use SQL, HTML, CSS and JavaScript, but it still has it's limitations even then. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Once you get your head round the terminology (which is probably different than whatever you call it) and know where to find what you're looking for, going from design of a process to implementation and end user consumption is really a fairly straightforward and simple-ish thing. It is definitely low code (you need to understand conditional logic but you're never actually writing script unless you need to do something the tools aren't designed for, and this is an additional module you have to pay for if you're a cloud customer), but you need a programmatic mindset to get the most out of it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The learning curve, honestly. Two years in (I'm a technical implementation team of one) and there are still things that I'm learning about that I simply didn't know to look for. Functionality we brute forced that had a automatic counterpart we simply didn't know was there (and didn't know to ask about).
The documentation leaves a lot to be desired as well. Well, not the documentation itself, it's great - once you can find what you're looking for. The search engine in the documentation isn't the best and again, unless you know specifically what you're looking for, you're going to be hard pressed to find help outside of their support system. Probably 75% of my support requests (access to which is free with purchase) are simply answered with a link to the documentation (which is what I want).
I've mentioned the terminology thing several times now, so I'll give an example. You want a certain process to fire every Friday. Say it's a reminder that people need to fill out timesheets (VERY simple example). You search the documentation for 'reminder', 'automatically start a process', and 'schedule a task' among other things before finally asking for help. The reply is simply "that's called a 'goal'" with a link to the appropriate documentation.
Another; you want people to be able to submit a variable list of names and addresses (think vendor options for a large PO) with requirements on the number based on other criteria (is it already a contracted vendor, is there only one vendor that provides this product). As far as the main tools are concerned, most things are an html-based form. But to have a variable number of entries is called an 'array'. Makes sense in retrospect but I was being told 'no code' so I wasn't thinking in programmatic terms. Once I knew that, I could read all about it and take a stab at implementing it.
I guess to sum up, the greatest asset - there's a literal sea of content and functionality to build whatever you want - is also it's hardest feature to get through. It's hard to document how to play in a sandbox. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.