Lors de l'évaluation des deux solutions, les examinateurs ont trouvé que Jama Connect for Requirements Management était plus facile à utiliser, à configurer et à administrer. Cependant, les examinateurs ont préféré faire des affaires avec Orcanos dans l'ensemble.
Captures requirements efficiently, pretty good requirements traceability options, baseline requirements easily, different views available, AGile ready, version tracking, test cases development, detailed workflows for estimation and manage project schedule.
Le processus de révision n'est pas lié aux champs dans les éléments.
It organizes the QMS on a higher level. Therefore, it reduces the work time on several activities.
The general UX interface of the platform is very complex with a lot of unecesarry clicks and fields which could be simplified. While all these processes have purpose and are effective it could be simplified and more adapable. This greaty diminished the ease...
Captures requirements efficiently, pretty good requirements traceability options, baseline requirements easily, different views available, AGile ready, version tracking, test cases development, detailed workflows for estimation and manage project schedule.
It organizes the QMS on a higher level. Therefore, it reduces the work time on several activities.
Le processus de révision n'est pas lié aux champs dans les éléments.
The general UX interface of the platform is very complex with a lot of unecesarry clicks and fields which could be simplified. While all these processes have purpose and are effective it could be simplified and more adapable. This greaty diminished the ease...