Al evaluar las dos soluciones, los revisores encontraron que AWS Management Console es más fácil de usar y configurar. Sin embargo, AWS Systems Manager es más fácil de administrar. Además, prefirieron hacer negocios en general con AWS Systems Manager.
La consola tiene muchas características disponibles. Permite un control muy granular de los recursos de la nube pública. Las características están ubicadas en categorías fáciles de entender y localizar.
The updated versions take a two clicks where the classic used to take one. An easy example is the find services, you could type RDS and then hit enter and it would take you to RDS. If you use the new search you type RDS but then you have to arrow down to...
being new to AWS i wanted somewhere I could manage the patch management and remote onto my instances with session manager all in one place, using this I can able to manage all the instances I have in one area
UI is terrible and inefficient. The search feature does not filter and search results correctly. It is tedious to sort through incorrect results or trying different combination to obtain a query that yields correct results. Also, it has a two-step search...
La consola tiene muchas características disponibles. Permite un control muy granular de los recursos de la nube pública. Las características están ubicadas en categorías fáciles de entender y localizar.
being new to AWS i wanted somewhere I could manage the patch management and remote onto my instances with session manager all in one place, using this I can able to manage all the instances I have in one area
The updated versions take a two clicks where the classic used to take one. An easy example is the find services, you could type RDS and then hit enter and it would take you to RDS. If you use the new search you type RDS but then you have to arrow down to...
UI is terrible and inefficient. The search feature does not filter and search results correctly. It is tedious to sort through incorrect results or trying different combination to obtain a query that yields correct results. Also, it has a two-step search...