QAComplete und Zephyr Enterprise vergleichen 
QAComplete vs Zephyr Enterprise
- Die Gutachter waren der Meinung, dass Zephyr Enterprise den Bedürfnissen ihres Unternehmens besser entspricht als QAComplete.
- Beim Vergleich der Qualität des laufenden Produktsupports bevorzugten die Gutachter Zephyr Enterprise.
- Bei Feature-Updates und Roadmaps bevorzugten unsere Rezensenten die Richtung von QAComplete gegenüber Zephyr Enterprise.
This tool is highly customizable to suit your company requirements . It contains all the required modules that one should have in a company to manage the testing life cycle from requirements to test reports. It could easily integrate with other bug...
Performance was horrible, and there were numerous issues\defects that we had to contend with. We worked with the SmartBear team for a considerable period to address our issues but were unsuccessful. In fact, the "pain" was so great that we simply abandoned...
Sie können Ihre Defekte mit Stories verknüpfen. Sie können Ihre Defekte mit Aufgaben verknüpfen. Sie können Ihre Defekte mit Anforderungen verknüpfen. Es ist wirklich einfach, Testfälle zu erstellen, diese Testfälle zu aktualisieren und diese...
Some of the organization is non-intuitive and buggy. I also think that it could be more user-friendly, perhaps with some pre-made templated test cases (titles giving hints on what to test and possible priorities)
This tool is highly customizable to suit your company requirements . It contains all the required modules that one should have in a company to manage the testing life cycle from requirements to test reports. It could easily integrate with other bug...
Sie können Ihre Defekte mit Stories verknüpfen. Sie können Ihre Defekte mit Aufgaben verknüpfen. Sie können Ihre Defekte mit Anforderungen verknüpfen. Es ist wirklich einfach, Testfälle zu erstellen, diese Testfälle zu aktualisieren und diese...
Performance was horrible, and there were numerous issues\defects that we had to contend with. We worked with the SmartBear team for a considerable period to address our issues but were unsuccessful. In fact, the "pain" was so great that we simply abandoned...
Some of the organization is non-intuitive and buggy. I also think that it could be more user-friendly, perhaps with some pre-made templated test cases (titles giving hints on what to test and possible priorities)
