Compare Windfall and iwave 
- Reviewers mention that iwave excels in its "Ease of Use" with a score of 9.0, making it user-friendly for organizations looking to quickly adopt the software, while Windfall, with a score of 8.8, is slightly less intuitive for new users.
- Users report that iwave's "Quality of Support" is highly rated at 9.1, with many praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, whereas Windfall has achieved a perfect score of 10.0, indicating exceptional support experiences according to its users.
- G2 users highlight that iwave has a strong "Product Direction" score of 9.0, suggesting that users feel confident in the software's future development, while Windfall's score of 8.2 indicates some concerns about its roadmap and feature updates.
- Users on G2 mention that iwave's "Meets Requirements" score of 8.7 reflects its ability to fulfill user needs effectively, but Windfall outperforms with a score of 9.4, showcasing its comprehensive feature set that aligns closely with user expectations.
- Reviewers say that both iwave and Windfall have the same score of 9.3 for "Ease of Setup," indicating that users find both platforms relatively straightforward to implement without significant hurdles.
- Users report that iwave has a larger number of reviews (437) compared to Windfall (28), suggesting a more established user base and potentially more reliable feedback, which can be a deciding factor for buyers looking for proven solutions.
- Unlimited One-off Searches
- Batch Screening
- Profiles
Windfall provides us with an important layer of data to use alongside our regular asks. Knowing more about the wealth of our constituents helps us customize our ask by using different strategies for wealthier constituents. It also makes asks easier when you...
The only downside I've found to Windfall is that it doesn't have a dedicated portal to work in, where you can play with the data a bit like some other tools offer. However, we knew going into it that Windfall didn't provide that, and still find the tool to...
iWave’s comprehensive database provides access to a vast amount of information on potential donors, helping us to make informed decisions about who to target for major gifts. This wealth of data significantly streamlines the prospect research process,...
Some aspects of the interface are confusing, with some sets of results about the same prospect conflicting depending on where in the program you look. Some of the data is inaccurate (for example, volunteers were listed in our Annual Report and picked up by...
Windfall provides us with an important layer of data to use alongside our regular asks. Knowing more about the wealth of our constituents helps us customize our ask by using different strategies for wealthier constituents. It also makes asks easier when you...
iWave’s comprehensive database provides access to a vast amount of information on potential donors, helping us to make informed decisions about who to target for major gifts. This wealth of data significantly streamlines the prospect research process,...
The only downside I've found to Windfall is that it doesn't have a dedicated portal to work in, where you can play with the data a bit like some other tools offer. However, we knew going into it that Windfall didn't provide that, and still find the tool to...
Some aspects of the interface are confusing, with some sets of results about the same prospect conflicting depending on where in the program you look. Some of the data is inaccurate (for example, volunteers were listed in our Annual Report and picked up by...
