- Home
- ...
- Sales Consultants
- The Harris Consulting Group
- Winning by Design
- The Harris Consulting Group-vs-Winning by Design
Compare The Harris Consulting Group and Winning by Design 
- Users report that Winning by Design excels in its "Go Live Support," with a score of 9.6, indicating a strong commitment to ensuring a smooth transition for clients. In contrast, The Harris Consulting Group does not have a score listed for this feature, which may suggest less emphasis on this critical phase.
- Reviewers mention that both products have high scores in "Documentation," with Winning by Design at 9.5 and The Harris Consulting Group also performing well. However, the lack of a score for The Harris Consulting Group in "Go Live Support" raises questions about their overall support during critical implementation phases.
- G2 users highlight that Winning by Design's "Training" feature received a score of 9.7, showcasing their effective onboarding processes. Meanwhile, The Harris Consulting Group's training capabilities are not explicitly rated, which could be a concern for potential users looking for comprehensive training solutions.
- Reviewers say that both products scored equally high in "Communication Skills" at 9.8, indicating that both companies prioritize clear and effective communication with their clients, which is essential for successful project execution.
- Users on G2 report that Winning by Design has a slight edge in "Best Practices" with a score of 9.6 compared to The Harris Consulting Group's 9.8. This suggests that while both companies are strong in this area, The Harris Consulting Group may have a more established framework for best practices.
- Users say that Winning by Design's "Technical Expertise" is rated at 9.5, while The Harris Consulting Group shines with a score of 9.9, indicating a superior level of technical knowledge and capability, which could be crucial for more complex projects.
Richards approach works for our team because he challenges the way run our processes, tackles objections and close deals. We literally take specific language Richard says and use them to move deals along, without sounding "salesy"
The format: highly collaborative; covered a lot of ground (renewals, QBRs, roadmap, cancellations, trainings, etc,); worked with us beforehand to ensure the structure and content would hit the mark and be effective for our group; while difficult to keep a...
The Account Executive team that I was on was trained by Jacco, while Dan trained the SDR's--I'm told the AE's actually got off easy and don't understand why the teams were actually split up as the training was equally elementary for all. There were no...
Richards approach works for our team because he challenges the way run our processes, tackles objections and close deals. We literally take specific language Richard says and use them to move deals along, without sounding "salesy"
The format: highly collaborative; covered a lot of ground (renewals, QBRs, roadmap, cancellations, trainings, etc,); worked with us beforehand to ensure the structure and content would hit the mark and be effective for our group; while difficult to keep a...
The Account Executive team that I was on was trained by Jacco, while Dan trained the SDR's--I'm told the AE's actually got off easy and don't understand why the teams were actually split up as the training was equally elementary for all. There were no...
