Compare TestRail and Tuskr 
- Users report that TestRail excels in its Test Repository feature, scoring 8.9, which allows for comprehensive test case management, while Tuskr, with a score of 9.1, offers a more intuitive interface that simplifies the organization of test cases.
- Reviewers mention that Tuskr's integration capabilities are superior, scoring 8.7 compared to TestRail's 7.9, highlighting that Tuskr seamlessly connects with various CI/CD tools, making it easier for teams to incorporate testing into their workflows.
- G2 users indicate that TestRail's reporting functionality, with a score of 8.3, is robust but can be complex to navigate, whereas Tuskr's reporting, scoring 8.9, is praised for its user-friendly dashboards that provide clear insights at a glance.
- Users on G2 note that TestRail's version control feature, scoring 8.2, is effective but lacks some advanced functionalities, while Tuskr's version control, with a score of 8.5, is highlighted for its simplicity and effectiveness in tracking changes over time.
- Reviewers say that TestRail's scaling capabilities, scoring 8.4, are adequate for mid-market needs, but Tuskr shines with a score of 8.8, making it a better choice for small businesses looking to grow without overwhelming complexity.
- Users report that both products have strong support, but Tuskr, with a quality of support score of 9.1, is frequently mentioned for its responsive customer service, while TestRail, scoring 8.4, has received mixed reviews regarding response times.
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
Tusk is one of the leading software for running test cases and remve bug cases before their final deployment. It enhances the testing process to great extent and ensures that exceptional usability and seamless integrtaions should be done in hassle free...
no simple tools. no copying simple and easy way to copy something and paste it where you want. no way to selec few test cases to delete them together. no way to create folder inside of a folder.
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
Tusk is one of the leading software for running test cases and remve bug cases before their final deployment. It enhances the testing process to great extent and ensures that exceptional usability and seamless integrtaions should be done in hassle free...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
no simple tools. no copying simple and easy way to copy something and paste it where you want. no way to selec few test cases to delete them together. no way to create folder inside of a folder.
