Compare TestRail and Testmo 
- Users report that TestRail excels in its Test Repository feature, scoring 8.9, which allows for efficient organization and management of test cases. In contrast, Testmo, while slightly higher at 9.0, does not offer the same level of customization that some users desire.
- Reviewers mention that TestRail's integration capabilities, rated at 7.9, are robust but can be complex to set up. Testmo, with a score of 7.7, has fewer integrations available, which some users find limiting for their workflows.
- Users on G2 highlight that TestRail's reporting functionality, rated at 8.3, provides comprehensive insights, although some find it less intuitive. Testmo's reporting, at 7.5, is seen as less detailed, which may hinder users looking for in-depth analytics.
- Reviewers say that TestRail's ease of setup, rated at 8.5, is generally straightforward, but some users report challenges with initial configuration. Testmo shines here with a higher score of 9.4, indicating a smoother onboarding experience.
- G2 users note that TestRail's quality of support, rated at 8.4, is reliable, but response times can vary. In contrast, Testmo's support, rated at 9.3, is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness, making it a preferred choice for users needing assistance.
- Users report that TestRail's version control feature, rated at 8.2, is effective for managing changes, but some find it lacking in automation. Testmo, with a score of 8.3, offers better automation options, which users appreciate for streamlining their testing processes.
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
- Full-featured test management, exploratory testing & automation
- Integration with Jira, GitHub, GitLab, CI, automation & more
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
The ability to search for and keep our tests organized has been a great change in my QA team. We were tracking with a spreadsheet which made it hard to search for existing test cases and see if any were duplicates. With Testmo's search feature it is...
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
The ability to search for and keep our tests organized has been a great change in my QA team. We were tracking with a spreadsheet which made it hard to search for existing test cases and see if any were duplicates. With Testmo's search feature it is...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
