Compare TestRail and Testiny 
- Users report that TestRail excels in its test repository functionality, scoring 8.9, while Testiny shines even brighter with a score of 9.5, indicating a more robust and user-friendly repository for managing test cases.
- Reviewers mention that Testiny offers superior ease of use with a score of 9.7 compared to TestRail's 8.6, suggesting that Testiny's interface and user experience are more intuitive for everyday users.
- G2 users highlight that Testiny's reporting capabilities are rated at 9.3, outperforming TestRail's 8.3, which indicates that Testiny provides more comprehensive and insightful reporting features that help teams track their testing progress effectively.
- Users on G2 report that Testiny's version control feature is particularly strong, scoring 9.7, while TestRail's score of 8.2 suggests that TestRail may not offer the same level of functionality for managing different versions of test cases.
- Reviewers say that Testiny's scaling capabilities are rated at 9.4, which is higher than TestRail's 8.4, indicating that Testiny is better suited for growing teams and projects that require flexibility and scalability.
- Users mention that while TestRail has a solid integration score of 7.9, Testiny's score of 8.1 shows that it offers slightly better integration options with other tools, making it a more versatile choice for teams using multiple software solutions.
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
- Test Cases, Test Plans & Test Runs
- Reporting (configurable PDF reports)
- Issue Tracker Integrations (Jira, GitLab, GitHub, Azure DevOps, Redmine & more)
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
Testiny simplifies testing and is not packed with functions that do not add value or increase productivity. It is reasonably priced. The dashboard is easy to use and creating test cases is simple. The support team is very responsive and welcoming.
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
Testiny simplifies testing and is not packed with functions that do not add value or increase productivity. It is reasonably priced. The dashboard is easy to use and creating test cases is simple. The support team is very responsive and welcoming.
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
