Users report that django CMS excels in its rich text editor, with a rating of 9.2, making content creation straightforward and user-friendly. In contrast, Strapi's rich text editor received a lower rating of 8.3, indicating that users may find it less intuitive.
Reviewers mention that django CMS has a strong quality of support, rated at 9.3, which is significantly higher than Strapi's 8.5. This suggests that users of django CMS feel more supported when encountering issues or needing assistance.
G2 users highlight that Strapi shines in API integrations, boasting a rating of 8.6, which is higher than django CMS's 7.8. This makes Strapi a better choice for developers looking for seamless integration with other applications.
Users on G2 report that django CMS offers a more robust asset management system, rated at 6.9, compared to Strapi's 8.2. This indicates that users may find it easier to manage and organize their digital assets with Strapi.
Reviewers mention that both platforms have similar content repository ratings of 8.1, indicating that users find both systems effective for storing and managing their content. However, the overall user experience may differ based on other features.
Users say that while both platforms support multi-language capabilities, django CMS has a rating of 7.9, which may suggest a more user-friendly approach to managing multilingual content compared to Strapi.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.