Compare LabVantage and STARLIMS 
- Users report that LabVantage excels in its Intellectual Protection and Compliance feature, scoring 9.0, which reviewers mention is crucial for maintaining regulatory standards in laboratory environments. In contrast, STARLIMS also performs well but does not highlight this feature as strongly.
- Reviewers mention that STARLIMS shines in Workflow Management, achieving a score of 8.9, which users say allows for better customization and efficiency in lab processes compared to LabVantage's lower score of 6.7.
- G2 users highlight LabVantage's Sample Management capabilities, scoring 8.3, but users on G2 note that STARLIMS significantly outperforms it with a score of 9.1, indicating a more robust system for tracking and managing samples.
- Users say that LabVantage's Quality of Support is rated at 7.6, which some reviewers find lacking, while STARLIMS boasts a higher score of 8.9, with users reporting more responsive and helpful customer service experiences.
- Reviewers mention that LabVantage's Ease of Admin is rated at 6.7, which users find cumbersome, whereas STARLIMS offers a more user-friendly administration experience with a score of 8.6, making it easier for lab managers to oversee operations.
- Users on G2 report that both products have similar scores for Meets Requirements at 8.8, but STARLIMS is noted for its better alignment with enterprise-level needs, as indicated by its larger market segment focus.
Allows for great cross functional communication and lab tracking. Results are easy for groups to see and they're always accessible. If I need to find a sample owned by more regular users, it is very quick.
Outdated, slow to run, no advanced functions,not very efficient at searching for items, very limited actions, can't copy information effectively.
The system we are currently using is an excellent application with a user-friendly interface and efficient functionality. It features a simple and easy-to-understand design and a rich set of functional modules that allow users to quickly get started and...
Really slow and outdated UI design. Supported by a team that clearly isn't user experience driven. Missing the boat on ELN implementation. Support team was decimated in favor of offshore savings. Web interface not supporting instruments interfacing unless...
Allows for great cross functional communication and lab tracking. Results are easy for groups to see and they're always accessible. If I need to find a sample owned by more regular users, it is very quick.
The system we are currently using is an excellent application with a user-friendly interface and efficient functionality. It features a simple and easy-to-understand design and a rich set of functional modules that allow users to quickly get started and...
Outdated, slow to run, no advanced functions,not very efficient at searching for items, very limited actions, can't copy information effectively.
Really slow and outdated UI design. Supported by a team that clearly isn't user experience driven. Missing the boat on ELN implementation. Support team was decimated in favor of offshore savings. Web interface not supporting instruments interfacing unless...
