- Home
- ...
- Sales Training Companies
- Sandler Training
- Winning by Design
- Sandler Training-vs-Winning by Design
Compare Sandler Training and Winning by Design 
- Users report that Winning by Design excels in its "Go Live Support," with a score of 9.6, indicating a strong commitment to helping clients transition smoothly, while Sandler Training's support in this area is less emphasized, leading to a perception of less comprehensive assistance during implementation.
- Reviewers mention that both products have high scores in "Documentation," with Winning by Design at 9.5 and Sandler Training also performing well, but users on G2 highlight that Winning by Design's documentation is more user-friendly and easier to navigate, enhancing the overall user experience.
- G2 users note that Winning by Design's "Training" score of 9.7 reflects a robust training program that effectively prepares users, whereas Sandler Training, with a score of 9.5, is seen as slightly less effective in delivering comprehensive training resources, which can impact user onboarding.
- Users say that in terms of "Technical Expertise," Sandler Training scores slightly higher at 9.6 compared to Winning by Design's 9.5, suggesting that Sandler may have a slight edge in providing specialized technical knowledge, which some users find beneficial for complex implementations.
- Reviewers mention that both products score well in "Meeting Management," with Winning by Design at 9.6 and Sandler Training at 9.5, but users report that Winning by Design's approach to managing meetings is more structured, leading to more productive sessions.
- Users on G2 highlight that Winning by Design's "Change Management Skills" score of 9.4 is indicative of a strong capability to handle transitions, while Sandler Training's score of 9.1 suggests that it may not be as adept at managing organizational changes, which can be crucial for clients undergoing significant transformations.
The majority of professionals carry out some type of constant updates to keep their skills aligned with the changing market. Your managers should too. You should too. We should all keep learning constantly.
The one issue we have had with Sandler is consistency with the program their people deliver. They all cover the same topics but would them to cover them for the same amount of time across the board.
The format and the content focused on SaaS sales. Usually in sales trainings, you get two full 8 hour days of training and then the content is forgotten two days after the training is over. WBD takes a more effective approach: splitting up the sessions...
The Account Executive team that I was on was trained by Jacco, while Dan trained the SDR's--I'm told the AE's actually got off easy and don't understand why the teams were actually split up as the training was equally elementary for all. There were no...
The majority of professionals carry out some type of constant updates to keep their skills aligned with the changing market. Your managers should too. You should too. We should all keep learning constantly.
The format and the content focused on SaaS sales. Usually in sales trainings, you get two full 8 hour days of training and then the content is forgotten two days after the training is over. WBD takes a more effective approach: splitting up the sessions...
The one issue we have had with Sandler is consistency with the program their people deliver. They all cover the same topics but would them to cover them for the same amount of time across the board.
The Account Executive team that I was on was trained by Jacco, while Dan trained the SDR's--I'm told the AE's actually got off easy and don't understand why the teams were actually split up as the training was equally elementary for all. There were no...
