Compare Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (41.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (59.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Star Rating
(12)5.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (41.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for KubernetesSentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Star Rating
(107)4.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (59.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SentinelOne Singularity Cloud SecuritySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes excels in Risk Scoring with a perfect score of 10.0, indicating its robust ability to assess and prioritize risks effectively. In contrast, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, while strong, has a slightly lower score of 9.7 in Risk Analysis, suggesting it may not be as comprehensive in risk evaluation.
- Reviewers mention that Red Hat's Compliance Monitoring feature scores 9.9, showcasing its effectiveness in ensuring compliance across Kubernetes environments. Meanwhile, SentinelOne's compliance features, while still strong at 9.8, may not provide the same level of assurance for users focused on Kubernetes compliance.
- G2 users highlight that Red Hat's Multicloud Visibility feature is rated 10.0, making it a standout for organizations operating in diverse cloud environments. Users on G2 note that SentinelOne's visibility features, rated at 9.6, may not offer the same depth of insight across multiple cloud platforms.
- Reviewers say that Red Hat's Security Auditing capabilities, with a score of 9.9, provide comprehensive insights into security practices, which is crucial for maintaining security standards. In comparison, SentinelOne's auditing features also score well at 9.9, but users report that Red Hat's implementation feels more integrated within Kubernetes workflows.
- Users report that SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security shines in Automated Scans with a score of 9.8, making it highly effective for continuous security assessments. However, Red Hat's score of 9.8 in Continuous Monitoring indicates that it also offers strong automated capabilities, particularly tailored for Kubernetes environments.
- Reviewers mention that Red Hat's Policy Enforcement feature, rated at 9.9, is particularly effective in managing security policies within Kubernetes clusters, providing users with a high level of control. Conversely, SentinelOne's policy management features, while effective, do not receive the same level of praise, scoring slightly lower at 9.7.
Featured Products
Sponsored
SafeBase
(124)
Container Monitoring
Visit Website
Sponsored
Halo Security
(3)
Container Monitoring
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
No pricing availableSentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
No pricing availableFree Trial
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
No trial information availableSentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.5
10
9.8
100
Ease of Use
9.4
9
9.9
100
Ease of Setup
9.2
8
9.8
53
Ease of Admin
9.4
8
9.7
53
Quality of Support
10.0
8
9.9
100
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
10.0
7
9.8
53
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
8
10.0
98
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
9.8
54
Not enough data
9.9
32
Not enough data
9.8
49
Operations
Not enough data
9.9
36
Not enough data
9.9
36
Not enough data
9.9
33
Security Controls
Not enough data
9.7
31
Not enough data
10.0
29
Not enough data
9.9
36
Not enough data
9.8
31
Administration
Not enough data
10.0
29
Not enough data
9.8
42
Not enough data
9.9
43
Not enough data
9.8
43
Monitoring
Not enough data
9.7
31
Not enough data
9.9
19
Not enough data
10.0
23
Protection
Not enough data
9.5
30
Not enough data
9.9
24
Not enough data
9.9
27
Not enough data
9.9
19
Security
Not enough data
9.9
49
Not enough data
9.8
27
Not enough data
9.9
23
Not enough data
9.8
45
Compliance
Not enough data
9.8
43
Not enough data
10.0
31
Not enough data
9.9
44
Administration
Not enough data
9.9
42
Not enough data
9.8
45
Not enough data
10.0
22
Performance
Not enough data
9.8
43
Not enough data
9.8
42
Not enough data
9.5
35
Not enough data
9.8
42
Network
Not enough data
10.0
28
Not enough data
9.9
19
Not enough data
10.0
30
Application
Not enough data
10.0
19
Not enough data
10.0
21
Not enough data
10.0
16
Activity Monitoring
Not enough data
9.9
27
Not enough data
9.9
28
Not enough data
9.6
29
Not enough data
9.8
24
Security
Not enough data
9.8
45
Not enough data
9.7
45
Not enough data
9.9
45
Administration
Not enough data
9.7
47
Not enough data
9.8
44
Not enough data
10.0
41
Configuration
Not enough data
10.0
22
Not enough data
9.8
43
Not enough data
9.7
43
Not enough data
9.9
29
Not enough data
10.0
30
Visibility
Not enough data
10.0
43
Not enough data
9.8
46
Vulnerability Management
Not enough data
9.9
39
Not enough data
9.9
47
Not enough data
9.9
47
Not enough data
9.9
45
Asset Management
Not enough data
9.6
41
Not enough data
9.8
18
Not enough data
9.4
36
Monitoring
Not enough data
9.7
36
Not enough data
9.7
38
Not enough data
9.9
38
Not enough data
10.0
39
Risk Management
Not enough data
9.8
51
Not enough data
9.8
42
Not enough data
9.8
34
Not enough data
9.8
27
Generative AI
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Alerts management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Issue Resolution
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security are categorized as Cloud Compliance, Container Security, and Cloud Workload Protection Platforms
Unique Categories
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes has no unique categories
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is categorized as Exposure Management Platforms, Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP), Attack Surface Management, Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), Cloud Security Monitoring and Analytics, Vulnerability Scanner, and Container Monitoring
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Financial Services
33.3%
Computer & Network Security
16.7%
Online Media
8.3%
Computer Software
8.3%
Other
0.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.4%
Financial Services
20.6%
Computer & Network Security
11.2%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
6.5%
Education Management
5.6%
Other
33.6%
Most Helpful Reviews
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Financial Services
Deep integrations with Kubernetes means we understand our environment and its risks a lot better
Most Helpful Critical Review
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Gaurav A.
Verified User in Financial Services
The best part is the support from their team. The tool itself is great and has most of the stuff you'd need. Covers all cloud providers. Almost Zero false positives. Has connectors for most of the apps. But still, I'd say the best part is their team. The...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Financial Services
Deep integrations with Kubernetes means we understand our environment and its risks a lot better
Gaurav A.
Verified User in Financial Services
The best part is the support from their team. The tool itself is great and has most of the stuff you'd need. Covers all cloud providers. Almost Zero false positives. Has connectors for most of the apps. But still, I'd say the best part is their team. The...
Alternatives
Discussions
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes has no discussions with answers
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
