Compare Ranorex Studio and TestComplete 
- Users report that Ranorex Studio excels in its ease of use, with a score of 8.4, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for a user-friendly interface. In contrast, TestComplete has a slightly lower ease of use rating at 8.0, which some users find less intuitive.
- Reviewers mention that Ranorex Studio offers robust test feedback capabilities, scoring 8.2, which helps teams quickly identify issues. TestComplete, while also strong in this area with a score of 8.1, may not provide the same level of detail that some users desire.
- G2 users highlight that Ranorex Studio's test history feature is rated at 8.5, allowing for better tracking and management of test cases over time. TestComplete's test history score of 7.8 indicates that it may not be as comprehensive in this aspect, leading to potential gaps in test management.
- Users on G2 report that Ranorex Studio shines in customization options, scoring 8.3, which allows teams to tailor the software to their specific needs. TestComplete, with a score of 8.2, offers customization as well, but some users feel it lacks the flexibility that Ranorex provides.
- Reviewers mention that Ranorex Studio's automation organization is rated at 8.3, which helps streamline the automation process effectively. In comparison, TestComplete's organization score of 7.5 suggests that users may face challenges in managing their automation workflows.
- Users say that both products have comparable quality of support, each scoring 8.1, but Ranorex Studio is often praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness, while some TestComplete users report slower response times in their support experiences.
- Enables test execution on physical and virtual devices that do not have Ranorex Studio installed
- Add to a premium license to run tests on additional physical and virtual machines.
- Required to use the Ranorex remote agent
The way Ranorex work in using Repository and Tracker tool is simply great. I do not have to worry about finding XML paths manually and storing them in variables. Ranorex does it all for me. :D
Creating stable paths for repository items is tricky. If you don't get it right,you have to adapt them constantly. For no clear reason sometimes a repo item is found, and the next time it cannot befound and the tes run breaks. Licence server is not...
TestComplete is a feature rich automation system. There are very few automation tasks is cannot do. I have automated 4 major automation projects on complex enterprise software products. My current project is > 190,000 lines of VBScript code. UI...
you must write the tests on the same machine you plan to run them. Any difference in resolution of screens between vms or physical devices could cause the app to not perform correclty
The way Ranorex work in using Repository and Tracker tool is simply great. I do not have to worry about finding XML paths manually and storing them in variables. Ranorex does it all for me. :D
TestComplete is a feature rich automation system. There are very few automation tasks is cannot do. I have automated 4 major automation projects on complex enterprise software products. My current project is > 190,000 lines of VBScript code. UI...
Creating stable paths for repository items is tricky. If you don't get it right,you have to adapt them constantly. For no clear reason sometimes a repo item is found, and the next time it cannot befound and the tes run breaks. Licence server is not...
you must write the tests on the same machine you plan to run them. Any difference in resolution of screens between vms or physical devices could cause the app to not perform correclty
