Compare Qase and testomat.io 
- Users report that Qase excels in its "Quality of Support," with a score of 9.6, while testomat.io shines even brighter with a score of 9.8, indicating that users find testomat.io's support to be more responsive and helpful.
- Reviewers mention that testomat.io offers superior "Integration" capabilities, scoring 9.2 compared to Qase's 8.2, which suggests that testomat.io can connect more seamlessly with other tools and platforms, enhancing workflow efficiency.
- G2 users highlight that testomat.io has a better "Test History" feature, scoring 9.6 versus Qase's 8.8, indicating that users appreciate the detailed tracking and reporting of past tests, which aids in understanding test performance over time.
- Users on G2 report that Qase has a strong "Test Feedback" feature with a score of 8.9, but testomat.io surpasses it with a score of 9.2, suggesting that testomat.io provides more comprehensive and actionable feedback on test results.
- Reviewers say that testomat.io's "Scaling" capabilities are impressive, scoring 9.5 compared to Qase's 8.7, which indicates that testomat.io is better suited for growing teams and larger projects, allowing for more extensive test management.
- Users report that both products have a solid "Test Repository" feature, scoring equally at 9.4, but reviewers mention that Qase's interface is more user-friendly, making it easier for teams to navigate and manage their test cases.
- Up to 3 users
- 500Mb for attachments
- Test case management
What I love most about QASE is that it is user-friendly and integrates exceptionally easily. Setting it up was easy, and soon became part of our daily operations we couldn’t do without. The test cases become easy to manage through the platforms intuitive...
Needs more functionality, ability to turn time tracking off, it's almost always wrong, I would also like items on the roadmap to actually be developed and not just left as empty promises, there are very old items, what is the point of being able to request...
For me, it is crucial to have the possibility to customize test scenarios in the way I want. For this case, Testomat.io has the possibility to specify test case structure in the markdown language, and also I can re-use predefined values in the new test...
While I have had an overall positive experience with Testomat.io, there are a few areas where I believe there is room for improvement: 1. **Learning Curve**: While Testomat.io is generally user-friendly, there is still a learning curve, especially for...
What I love most about QASE is that it is user-friendly and integrates exceptionally easily. Setting it up was easy, and soon became part of our daily operations we couldn’t do without. The test cases become easy to manage through the platforms intuitive...
For me, it is crucial to have the possibility to customize test scenarios in the way I want. For this case, Testomat.io has the possibility to specify test case structure in the markdown language, and also I can re-use predefined values in the new test...
Needs more functionality, ability to turn time tracking off, it's almost always wrong, I would also like items on the roadmap to actually be developed and not just left as empty promises, there are very old items, what is the point of being able to request...
While I have had an overall positive experience with Testomat.io, there are a few areas where I believe there is room for improvement: 1. **Learning Curve**: While Testomat.io is generally user-friendly, there is still a learning curve, especially for...
