Compare QAComplete and TestRail 
- Reviews say that QAComplete excels in its Test Repository feature, scoring an impressive 8.9, which allows users to efficiently manage and organize their test cases. In contrast, TestRail, while still strong, does not have a specific score for this feature but is noted for its overall ease of use.
- Users report that TestRail shines in its integration capabilities, achieving a score of 7.9, which allows seamless connections with various tools and platforms. QAComplete, however, has received mixed feedback on its integration, indicating that users sometimes face challenges when trying to connect with other software.
- Reviewers mention that TestRail's reporting functionality is a standout, with a score of 8.3, providing detailed insights and analytics that help teams track their testing progress effectively. QAComplete's reporting is rated lower, suggesting that users may find it less comprehensive or user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight that TestRail's ease of setup is a significant advantage, scoring 8.5, which means teams can get started quickly without extensive configuration. In comparison, QAComplete does not have a specific score for setup, indicating potential hurdles in initial implementation.
- Users on G2 indicate that QAComplete's version control feature is rated at 8.2, which is beneficial for teams needing to manage changes in test cases over time. TestRail, while not specifically rated for version control, is often praised for its overall management capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that QAComplete's scaling capabilities score 8.4, making it suitable for mid-market companies looking to grow their testing processes. TestRail, with a higher overall rating, is also recognized for its scalability, but specific user feedback suggests it may be more adaptable for larger teams.
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
QAComplete has the potential to manage project requirements, releases, and reporting. With the right setup any portion of information in your project may be linked to all other relative information. This can mean tickets linking to requirements, or test...
QAComplete encounters performance issues when dealing with large scale development infrastructures. There are aspects where the support provided is lacking despite Smart Bears marketing efforts.
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
QAComplete has the potential to manage project requirements, releases, and reporting. With the right setup any portion of information in your project may be linked to all other relative information. This can mean tickets linking to requirements, or test...
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
QAComplete encounters performance issues when dealing with large scale development infrastructures. There are aspects where the support provided is lacking despite Smart Bears marketing efforts.
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
