Best Software for 2025 is now live!

Compare QA Wolf and mabl

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
QA Wolf
QA Wolf
Star Rating
(119)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (51.3% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 9999 Tests
Learn more about QA Wolf
mabl
mabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mabl
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that mabl excels in its "Test Feedback" feature, scoring 9.1, which allows for quick identification of issues during testing, while QA Wolf shines slightly brighter with a score of 9.4, providing more detailed insights that help teams understand failures better.
  • Reviewers mention that QA Wolf's "Quality of Support" is exceptional, with a score of 9.9, indicating that users feel well-supported and valued, whereas mabl, while still strong at 9.2, does not reach the same level of user satisfaction in support services.
  • G2 users highlight that mabl's "Customization" options are robust, scoring 8.8, allowing teams to tailor their testing processes, but QA Wolf offers a more streamlined experience with a slightly lower score of 8.7, which some users feel limits flexibility.
  • Users on G2 report that QA Wolf's "Test Variety" feature is a standout, scoring 9.3, which enables users to conduct a wide range of tests effectively, while mabl's score of 8.5 suggests it may not offer the same breadth of testing options.
  • Reviewers mention that mabl's "Ease of Setup" is rated at 8.8, which is decent, but QA Wolf outperforms with a score of 9.4, indicating that users find it easier to get started with QA Wolf's intuitive setup process.
  • Users say that both products have strong "Reliability" scores, with mabl at 9.0 and QA Wolf at 9.2, but QA Wolf's higher score suggests a slight edge in consistent performance during testing cycles.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
QA Wolf
Zero-effort automated QA
Contact Us
9999 Tests
Learn more about QA Wolf
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Learn more about mabl
Free Trial
QA Wolf
No trial information available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
116
8.6
28
Ease of Use
9.2
116
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
9.4
56
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
9.4
42
9.0
5
Quality of Support
9.9
115
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.8
44
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.9
117
8.7
26
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.2
467
8.8
118
Functionality
9.4
67
9.1
17
9.1
67
9.2
17
8.7
67
8.8
17
9.3
67
8.5
17
Automation
9.5
67
8.3
16
9.2
66
9.0
17
9.4
66
8.8
17
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
QA Wolf
QA Wolf
mabl
mabl
QA Wolf and mabl are categorized as Automation Testing and Software Testing
Unique Categories
QA Wolf
QA Wolf has no unique categories
mabl
mabl is categorized as Load Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
QA Wolf
QA Wolf
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
51.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
47.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
0.8%
mabl
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
36.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
44.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
19.4%
Reviewers' Industry
QA Wolf
QA Wolf
Computer Software
42.0%
Marketing and Advertising
10.1%
Information Technology and Services
5.0%
Hospital & Health Care
5.0%
Automotive
4.2%
Other
33.6%
mabl
mabl
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Most Helpful Reviews
QA Wolf
QA Wolf
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Brian W.
BW
Brian W.
Verified User in Computer Software

We pretty much use QA Wolf exclusively for our regression testing and keeping track of our system's state. As someone who's worked with a lot of different types of QA services, both on in-house and external, I have found the QAEs very good at being...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising

Efficiency can be improved. There has been good progress.

mabl
mabl
Most Helpful Favorable Review
GV
Gretel V.
Verified User in Insurance

The tool's simplicity and straightforwardness enable our organization to spend more time in carefully planning, analyzing, and prioritizing what needs to be automated and be able to automate and deliver the tests in a small amount of time. This way, the...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Food Production

Inconsistencies in testing environments

Alternatives
QA Wolf
QA Wolf Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
LambdaTest
LambdaTest
Add LambdaTest
Postman
Postman
Add Postman
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
mabl
mabl Alternatives
Cypress
Cypress
Add Cypress
Tricentis Testim
Tricentis Testim
Add Tricentis Testim
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Postman
Postman
Add Postman
Discussions
QA Wolf
QA Wolf Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
QA Wolf has no discussions with answers
mabl
mabl Discussions
What does mabl do?
1 comment
Cindy S.
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 comment
Greg G.
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs. It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 comment
Greg G.
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more