Compare PractiTest and Tuskr 
- Users report that PractiTest's Test Repository feature scores an 8.9, providing a solid foundation for managing test cases, while Tuskr shines with a score of 9.1, highlighting its superior organization and ease of access to test artifacts.
- Reviewers mention that PractiTest offers good integration capabilities with a score of 8.5, but Tuskr edges ahead with an 8.7, making it easier to connect with other tools in the software development lifecycle.
- G2 users note that PractiTest's Reporting feature scores 8.6, which is effective but lacks some advanced analytics, whereas Tuskr's Reporting feature scores 8.9, providing more comprehensive insights and customizable reporting options.
- Users on G2 highlight that PractiTest's Ease of Use is rated at 8.3, which some find a bit challenging, while Tuskr's Ease of Use is rated at 9.3, making it more user-friendly and intuitive for new users.
- Reviewers say that PractiTest's version control is rated at 8.6, which is functional but could be improved, while Tuskr's version control is rated slightly lower at 8.5, indicating that both products have room for enhancement in this area.
- Users report that PractiTest excels in Requirements Listing with a perfect score of 9.1, allowing for clear tracking of requirements, while Tuskr does not have this feature highlighted as strongly, indicating a potential gap in requirement management.
- Issues, Requirements, Tests, and Test Sets & Runs
- Unlimited Custom Fields and Filters
- Unlimited Projects
1. Visibility Visibility Visibility!!! The dashboard is amazing. I can create new tabs for my personal use and use fields and filters for the data. We use also the external dashboards and it really helps us all be aligned (we have it right in-front of the...
Search feature returns are head-scratching--searching for specific test cases rarely return anything useful. Filters and Folders structures are convoluted and archaic--ultimately these become catch-all areas and become useless over time. Mass editing is...
Tusk is one of the leading software for running test cases and remve bug cases before their final deployment. It enhances the testing process to great extent and ensures that exceptional usability and seamless integrtaions should be done in hassle free...
- User experice can be better in -- Choosing a better theme (primary, secondary colors) -- Dashboard feels sluggish if there is too much data -- Not having the ability to customize Dashboard
1. Visibility Visibility Visibility!!! The dashboard is amazing. I can create new tabs for my personal use and use fields and filters for the data. We use also the external dashboards and it really helps us all be aligned (we have it right in-front of the...
Tusk is one of the leading software for running test cases and remve bug cases before their final deployment. It enhances the testing process to great extent and ensures that exceptional usability and seamless integrtaions should be done in hassle free...
Search feature returns are head-scratching--searching for specific test cases rarely return anything useful. Filters and Folders structures are convoluted and archaic--ultimately these become catch-all areas and become useless over time. Mass editing is...
- User experice can be better in -- Choosing a better theme (primary, secondary colors) -- Dashboard feels sluggish if there is too much data -- Not having the ability to customize Dashboard
