Compare Platform.sh and Salesforce Heroku 
- Users report that Salesforce Heroku excels in Application Deployment with a score of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for developers looking for seamless deployment processes. In contrast, Platform.sh follows closely with a score of 9.2, indicating strong performance but slightly less user satisfaction.
- Reviewers mention that Platform.sh shines in Security, achieving a score of 9.2, which is higher than Salesforce Heroku's score of 8.9. This suggests that users feel more secure with Platform.sh's security features, including advanced WAF and DDoS protection.
- G2 users highlight the Quality of Support as a significant differentiator, with Platform.sh receiving a score of 8.6 compared to Salesforce Heroku's 7.9. This indicates that users find Platform.sh's support more responsive and helpful when issues arise.
- Users on G2 report that Salesforce Heroku offers superior Integration capabilities, scoring 9.0, which is essential for businesses looking to connect various tools and services. Platform.sh, while still strong, has not been rated as highly in this area.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms perform well in Developer Tools, with Salesforce Heroku scoring 9.1 and Platform.sh at 8.7. However, users feel that Salesforce Heroku provides a more comprehensive set of tools that enhance the development experience.
- Users say that when it comes to Automation, Salesforce Heroku leads with a score of 9.3, indicating a robust set of automation features that streamline workflows. Platform.sh, while still effective, scores slightly lower at 8.8, suggesting room for improvement in this area.
- Environments generated on the fly from your Git branches
- Support for microservices with multiple apps per project
- Data services built in: MySql, Redis, Solr, ElasticSearch, Postgres, Kafka, InfluxDB, RabbitMQ, and more.
- Deploy with Git and Docker
- Custom domains
- Container orchestration
I use Platform.sh to host ContribKanban.com. Platform.sh let me focus on development instead of how I would run deployment of my application. No longer do I need to work on my own infrastructure for running the build of my application, nor its services.
- customer suport - daily backups aren't automatic - backup retention for a few days - control panel has errors and generally does not represent reality - bitbucket integration doesn't work so well
Take a concept live in minutes. Viable for many, many different sizes of project. Ties right into my git workflow with very low hurdles. They provide great docs, and are so widely used that it is easy to find answers to questions through Google.
OUTAGES! EC2 goes down, it takes Heroku with it. However the outages have gone much further than that. We use a shared Postgres database, and that keeps going down, knocking us over. Then, there are sometimes problems with restart, so we have a cascade...
I use Platform.sh to host ContribKanban.com. Platform.sh let me focus on development instead of how I would run deployment of my application. No longer do I need to work on my own infrastructure for running the build of my application, nor its services.
Take a concept live in minutes. Viable for many, many different sizes of project. Ties right into my git workflow with very low hurdles. They provide great docs, and are so widely used that it is easy to find answers to questions through Google.
- customer suport - daily backups aren't automatic - backup retention for a few days - control panel has errors and generally does not represent reality - bitbucket integration doesn't work so well
OUTAGES! EC2 goes down, it takes Heroku with it. However the outages have gone much further than that. We use a shared Postgres database, and that keeps going down, knocking us over. Then, there are sometimes problems with restart, so we have a cascade...
