Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Opentext functional Testing for Developers and Postman 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
HAProxy
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (63.6% of reviews)
Mid-Market (37.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Star Rating
(12)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional Testing for DevelopersPostman
Star Rating
(1,638)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Postman excels in API Testing with a score of 9.5, highlighting its user-friendly interface and robust features for creating and executing tests. In contrast, OpenText UFT Developer has a lower score of 9.4, with reviewers mentioning that while it offers solid testing capabilities, it can be less intuitive for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Postman’s API Monitoring feature scores an impressive 9.5, allowing users to track API performance effectively. On the other hand, OpenText UFT Developer's API Monitoring is rated at 8.8, with users noting that it lacks some of the advanced monitoring capabilities found in Postman.
- G2 users highlight Postman's ease of use with a score of 9.1, stating that the platform is straightforward for both beginners and experienced developers. Conversely, OpenText UFT Developer has a lower ease of use rating of 8.2, with reviewers mentioning a steeper learning curve due to its more complex interface.
- Users on G2 report that Postman shines in API Discovery with a score of 9.0, making it easy to find and document APIs. In contrast, OpenText UFT Developer does not have a dedicated API Discovery feature, which users say limits its functionality in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Postman’s collaboration features, such as Design Management and Visibility, score 8.9, facilitating teamwork on API projects. OpenText UFT Developer, however, has lower collaboration scores, with users reporting that it lacks some of the integrated collaboration tools that Postman offers.
- Users say that Postman’s product direction is rated at 9.0, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement and user feedback. In contrast, OpenText UFT Developer has a significantly lower product direction score of 4.8, with reviewers expressing concerns about the pace of updates and feature enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
No pricing availablePostman
Free Plan
Free
For individuals or a small team of 3 or less to start testing APIs.
- Up to 3 collaborators
- Access to API Client
- 3 Packages
Free Trial
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
No trial information availablePostman
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
9
9.3
1,293
Ease of Use
8.3
9
9.1
1,308
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.3
554
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.9
180
Quality of Support
8.3
8
8.7
1,074
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.0
152
Product Direction (% positive)
4.2
8
9.2
1,253
Features by Category
API Management
Not enough data
8.8
147
Not enough data
9.1
149
Not enough data
8.7
145
Not enough data
8.7
141
Security Testing
Not enough data
8.7
140
Not enough data
9.4
143
Not enough data
9.5
146
Security Management
Not enough data
8.8
137
Not enough data
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.0
135
Development
Not enough data
9.5
559
Not enough data
8.8
514
Not enough data
8.7
494
Not enough data
8.8
508
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.8
521
Not enough data
8.8
498
Not enough data
8.9
511
Functionality
Not enough data
9.4
31
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
8.9
30
Not enough data
9.6
30
Usability
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
9.0
31
Not enough data
9.5
33
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.4
17
Functionality - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
7.8
16
Not enough data
8.0
16
Data and Analytics - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
9.0
15
Integration - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Development - API Platforms
Not enough data
9.4
300
Not enough data
8.9
290
Not enough data
8.7
280
Not enough data
8.8
284
Collaboration - API Platforms
Not enough data
8.8
284
Not enough data
8.7
282
Not enough data
8.6
276
API Management - API Platforms
Not enough data
9.0
285
Not enough data
8.4
281
Not enough data
8.5
275
Not enough data
8.9
279
Not enough data
8.3
272
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
8.1
175
Not enough data
8.0
175
Not enough data
8.2
176
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
Not enough data
9.5
823
Not enough data
8.7
725
Not enough data
8.6
668
Not enough data
8.8
374
API Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
760
Not enough data
8.9
738
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
647
Data Integration
Not enough data
8.8
680
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Opentext functional Testing for Developers and Postman are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
Opentext functional Testing for Developers is categorized as Automation Testing
Postman is categorized as Service Virtualization, API Platforms, API Development, API Security, API Management, Build Automation, and AI Agent Builders
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Postman
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
45.5%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Consulting
9.1%
Financial Services
9.1%
Consumer Goods
9.1%
Other
9.1%
Computer Software
35.0%
Information Technology and Services
30.7%
Financial Services
3.2%
Banking
2.0%
Internet
1.8%
Other
27.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Opentext functional Testing for Developers has no discussions with answers
What is Postman used for?
6 Comments
KK
Personnaly i used postman for connect multiple softwares through API.Read more
Is it possible to make such a service in the form of a Web App ?
3 Comments
VN
Hey Shrini,
We recently launched Postman on the Web feature to use on a browser. Make sure to install the Postman Agent file to bypass any CORDS...Read more
Is there any alternative?
3 Comments
LP
There exists Postwoman as an alternative:
https://postwoman.ioRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
