Compare MobaXTerm and Solar-PuTTY 
- Users report that MobaXTerm excels in its user interface, particularly with features like "Scrolling" and "Customization," scoring 9.1 and 8.9 respectively, while Solar-PuTTY lags behind with scores of 7.9 and 6.5. Reviewers mention that MobaXTerm's interface is more intuitive and visually appealing.
- Reviewers mention that MobaXTerm's "Plugins" feature is rated at 8.4, significantly outperforming Solar-PuTTY's 6.3. Users say that the variety and functionality of plugins available in MobaXTerm enhance productivity and flexibility in workflows.
- G2 users highlight MobaXTerm's superior "Latency" performance with a score of 8.6 compared to Solar-PuTTY's 7.7. Users report that MobaXTerm provides a more responsive experience, especially during remote sessions.
- Users on G2 indicate that MobaXTerm's "Logging" capabilities are rated at 9.0, while Solar-PuTTY only scores 6.7. Reviewers mention that MobaXTerm's logging features allow for better tracking and auditing of sessions, which is crucial for security and compliance.
- Reviewers mention that MobaXTerm's "Remote Device Control" feature scores an impressive 8.9, while Solar-PuTTY's performance in this area is less robust. Users say that MobaXTerm provides a more seamless experience for managing remote devices.
- Users report that MobaXTerm's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.4, slightly lower than Solar-PuTTY's 8.8. However, reviewers mention that MobaXTerm's support is still highly responsive and effective, making it a reliable choice for users needing assistance.
It supports a lot of different protocols and has a lot of customizable parameters, so we are able to connect to a set of servers with very different features. Pretty easy to setup and quick to run, it is a solid piece of software.
Sometimes, when it goes out, it doesn't detect the programs listed in a specific server. While I would use another application, it detects it perfectly fine.
An exceptionally user-friendly command-line terminal that amalgamates the finest attributes of both Putty and SuperPutty. This terminal not only boasts ease of use but also combines the robust functionalities of these renowned tools, providing users with a...
The original Putty is more feature rich in the type of connections and detailed configuration types SCP/SFTP is not supported yet, using other tools for that
It supports a lot of different protocols and has a lot of customizable parameters, so we are able to connect to a set of servers with very different features. Pretty easy to setup and quick to run, it is a solid piece of software.
An exceptionally user-friendly command-line terminal that amalgamates the finest attributes of both Putty and SuperPutty. This terminal not only boasts ease of use but also combines the robust functionalities of these renowned tools, providing users with a...
Sometimes, when it goes out, it doesn't detect the programs listed in a specific server. While I would use another application, it detects it perfectly fine.
The original Putty is more feature rich in the type of connections and detailed configuration types SCP/SFTP is not supported yet, using other tools for that
