Compare Kualitee and TestRail 
- Users report that TestRail excels in its Test Repository feature, scoring 8.9, which allows for efficient organization and management of test cases. In contrast, Kualitee, while still strong at 9.0, is noted for its more intuitive interface that enhances user experience.
- Reviewers mention that Kualitee's Integration capabilities are superior, with a score of 8.4 compared to TestRail's 7.9. Users appreciate Kualitee's seamless connections with various CI/CD tools, making it easier to incorporate into existing workflows.
- G2 users highlight that Kualitee shines in Reporting, achieving a score of 9.0, which is significantly higher than TestRail's 8.3. Reviewers appreciate Kualitee's customizable reporting options that provide deeper insights into testing progress and outcomes.
- Users on G2 report that TestRail's Bug Monitoring features, particularly its Bug History scoring 9.0, are robust, allowing teams to track and manage bugs effectively. However, Kualitee's analytics capabilities, while slightly lower at 8.9, are praised for their user-friendly dashboards.
- Reviewers mention that both products perform well in Quality of Support, with Kualitee scoring 8.9 compared to TestRail's 8.4. Users appreciate Kualitee's responsive customer service and extensive documentation, which enhances the overall user experience.
- Users say that Kualitee's Scaling capabilities, scoring 8.6, are particularly beneficial for growing teams, as it adapts well to increasing project demands. TestRail, with a score of 8.4, is also effective but may require more manual adjustments as teams expand.
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
I like that you can set up an unlimited number of projects, create testing teams and the dashboard is useful to track your progress. It allows you to re-use test cases suites as in the instance of regression testing. There is also a reporting feature.
Sometimes, when we open defects from email, all details will be empty. It happens even on very high internet so not an internet issue. Sometimes it's a little slow. It takes a little bit of time to load things. Initially, it took me little time to...
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
I like that you can set up an unlimited number of projects, create testing teams and the dashboard is useful to track your progress. It allows you to re-use test cases suites as in the instance of regression testing. There is also a reporting feature.
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
Sometimes, when we open defects from email, all details will be empty. It happens even on very high internet so not an internet issue. Sometimes it's a little slow. It takes a little bit of time to load things. Initially, it took me little time to...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
