Compare Jira and Shortcut 
- Users report that Jira excels in its Time Tracking feature, scoring 8.6, which allows teams to monitor their time spent on tasks effectively. In contrast, Shortcut's time tracking is rated significantly lower at 5.7, leading reviewers to mention that they find it less reliable for tracking project timelines.
- Reviewers mention that Jira's Bug Monitoring capabilities, particularly in Analytics and Bug History, are highly rated at 8.6 and 8.9 respectively. Users on G2 appreciate the detailed insights provided, while Shortcut's corresponding scores of 9.2 and 9.3 indicate strong performance, but some users feel it lacks the depth of reporting that Jira offers.
- G2 users highlight that Jira's Custom Workflows feature, rated at 8.6, allows for extensive customization to fit various team needs. In comparison, Shortcut's score of 8.1 suggests it offers some customization, but reviewers say it may not be as flexible or robust as Jira's options.
- Users say that Jira's Progress Monitoring feature, rated at 8.8, provides a comprehensive view of project status, which is crucial for larger teams. Shortcut, with a score of 8.6, is also effective, but some reviewers mention that it lacks certain visualizations that Jira provides.
- Reviewers mention that Jira's Community Forum is rated at 8.2, which fosters a strong user community for support and ideas. In contrast, Shortcut's score of 7.6 indicates a less active community, leading some users to feel they have fewer resources for troubleshooting and collaboration.
- Users report that both products have similar ratings for Kanban Board functionality, both scoring 8.8. However, reviewers say that Jira's implementation is more feature-rich, allowing for better task management and visualization compared to Shortcut's simpler approach.
- Manage all ongoing work in Stories
- Plan multiple sprints using Iterations
- Get tailored reports for quick insights
We use JIRA extensively for issue management and tracking. Each team has a project and it is a great way to work amongst teams and collaborate. The tool is very versatile and great to have project leaders, watchers, stakeholders, etc. They also have...
Consider three pitfalls when adopting JIRA - two pertaining to administration teams and one pertaining to end-users. Admin Pitfall #1: while JIRA does in fact allow administrators the ability to build customized issue types, workflows and artifacts,...
Shortcut allows me to create and complete events and integrate team features so tasks are assigned to the correct people.
The Roadmap is there, but it needs visibility improvements. You need to be able to close an epic in a milestone and have it disappear. You shouldn't have to have a date range to have the epics show up in the milestones. I end up putting arbitrary numbers...
We use JIRA extensively for issue management and tracking. Each team has a project and it is a great way to work amongst teams and collaborate. The tool is very versatile and great to have project leaders, watchers, stakeholders, etc. They also have...
Shortcut allows me to create and complete events and integrate team features so tasks are assigned to the correct people.
Consider three pitfalls when adopting JIRA - two pertaining to administration teams and one pertaining to end-users. Admin Pitfall #1: while JIRA does in fact allow administrators the ability to build customized issue types, workflows and artifacts,...
The Roadmap is there, but it needs visibility improvements. You need to be able to close an epic in a milestone and have it disappear. You shouldn't have to have a date range to have the epics show up in the milestones. I end up putting arbitrary numbers...
