Compare HackerRank Developer Skills Platform and Karat 
- Users report that the "Technical Screening" feature in HackerRank Developer Skills Platform is highly effective, scoring 9.0, while Karat's equivalent feature only scores 7.9, indicating a stronger capability in HackerRank for assessing developer skills.
- Reviewers mention that HackerRank excels in "Coding Development" with a score of 8.9, compared to Karat's 7.3, suggesting that users find HackerRank's coding assessments more comprehensive and user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight the "File Sharing" functionality in Karat, which received a high score of 9.3, while HackerRank's score of 8.4 indicates that Karat may offer a more seamless experience for sharing files during assessments.
- Users on G2 report that the "Mobility" feature in Karat is superior, scoring 9.3 compared to HackerRank's 8.2, suggesting that Karat provides a better mobile experience for users conducting assessments on the go.
- Reviewers say that the "Quality of Support" is slightly better in Karat, with a score of 9.3 versus HackerRank's 9.2, indicating that users may find Karat's customer service more responsive and helpful.
- Users mention that both platforms have similar scores for "Integrations" at 8.3, but HackerRank's overall performance in other areas may provide a more robust solution for enterprises looking for a comprehensive developer skills assessment tool.
This tool helps us assess the problem-solving techniques, programming and logical thinking of the candidate with multiple use cases. We generally hire for different technologies like Java, Node.js and this tool has all the necessary libraries for that.
Currently the platform has a very limited set of MCQ questions on various technologies. This must be increased. There are certain skillset in which only one question is present. For example .NET Advanced only one objective MCQ. This is not what we expect as...
Provides a lot of flexibility in scheduling interviews for the best time for candidates. Additionally, the quality of interviewers and candidate quality reporting is very impressive.
This is part of our candidate experience, so it is very frustrating to have an interviewer who is more concerned about making a few hundred dollars than actually helping a company move the needle on hiring. It's a transaction for them. Also, at first,...
This tool helps us assess the problem-solving techniques, programming and logical thinking of the candidate with multiple use cases. We generally hire for different technologies like Java, Node.js and this tool has all the necessary libraries for that.
Provides a lot of flexibility in scheduling interviews for the best time for candidates. Additionally, the quality of interviewers and candidate quality reporting is very impressive.
Currently the platform has a very limited set of MCQ questions on various technologies. This must be increased. There are certain skillset in which only one question is present. For example .NET Advanced only one objective MCQ. This is not what we expect as...
This is part of our candidate experience, so it is very frustrating to have an interviewer who is more concerned about making a few hundred dollars than actually helping a company move the needle on hiring. It's a transaction for them. Also, at first,...
